IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0354102.html

Physical measures of physical functioning as prognostic factors in predicting outcomes for neck pain: Protocol for a prospective longitudinal cohort study

Author

Listed:
  • Rabea Begum
  • Paul Parikh
  • David Walton
  • Alison Rushton

Abstract

Introduction: Neck pain is a common musculoskeletal condition that contributes to significant global burden. Evidence on physical measures of functioning as prognostic factors for neck pain remains limited. The objective of this study is to investigate whether physical measures of physical functioning as prognostic factors predict outcomes for people with neck pain. Methods: This protocol for a prospective longitudinal cohort study will recruit approximately 156 adults with neck pain of any duration. Physical measures of physical functioning including impairment, performance, and activity measures in a real environment, will be assessed as prognostic factors. Outcomes at 12-month follow-up will include pain, disability, and overall changes, assessed using the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), Neck Disability Index (NDI), and Global Rating of Change (GROC), respectively. Hierarchical regression analyses will be conducted separately for each physical measure and outcome. Physical measures will first be entered alone to examine the initial unadjusted (bivariate) association with the outcome, followed by adjustment for covariates (age, sex and baseline NPRS/NDI). Additional contribution will be evaluated using changes in explained variance ΔR2 and F-change statistics. Physical measures demonstrating additional contribution will subsequently be entered into the final penalized multivariable regression model using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression to reduce overfitting and identify the most relevant prognostic factors. Sensitivity analyses comparing penalized and non-penalized multivariable regression models will also be conducted to examine the consistency and stability of the findings. Prognostic effects will be reported as beta coefficients (β) or odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Each model will be internally validated using bootstrapping, with model performance evaluated using calibration and discrimination. Discussion: This study will provide new insights into how physical measures of physical functioning relate to outcomes for neck pain. The resulting prognostic models have the potential to strengthen clinical decision-making, support personalized care, and guide the development of targeted interventions for people with neck pain. Registration number: The protocol has prospectively registered on the Open Science Framework (OSF). The link is https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/HG6PJ.

Suggested Citation

  • Rabea Begum & Paul Parikh & David Walton & Alison Rushton, 2026. "Physical measures of physical functioning as prognostic factors in predicting outcomes for neck pain: Protocol for a prospective longitudinal cohort study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(7), pages 1-19, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0354102
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0354102
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0354102
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0354102&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0354102?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0354102. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.