IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0354025.html

Psychometric evaluation of the GHQ-28 in a South African recidivist sample

Author

Listed:
  • Thabile S Manengela
  • Erhabor Sunday Idemudia
  • Lawrence Ejike Ugwu

Abstract

This study evaluated the psychometric performance of the 28-item General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-28) in an archived South African recidivist sample. Data from 385 respondents were examined using item descriptives, corrected item-total correlations, confirmatory factor analysis, internal-consistency estimates, exploratory network analysis, and post hoc reduced-item sensitivity models; the network analysis used 327 complete cases. Among the full-scale models, the correlated four-factor model showed the best relative fit, chi-square(344) = 543.81, CFI = .944, TLI = .939, RMSEA = .042, and SRMR = .105. The elevated SRMR and several negative or weak loadings, however, indicated residual misfit and possible item-direction or scoring problems. Cronbach’s alpha was.747 for the total score and ranged from.403 to.733 across the four domains. Anxiety/Insomnia and Severe Depression performed more consistently than Somatic Symptoms and Social Dysfunction. Network results were mixed rather than uniformly convergent with the latent-variable findings. Reduced-item models produced better descriptive fit indices, but they used different item sets, were data-driven, and did not establish a validated short form. Because the original item labels and scoring key were not available for independent verification, domain-level interpretations, especially for Somatic Symptoms and Social Dysfunction, remain provisional. The results provide preliminary support for a multidimensional representation of distress while underscoring the need to verify item direction, reproduce the analyses from the archived code, and replicate the findings in independent correctional samples.

Suggested Citation

  • Thabile S Manengela & Erhabor Sunday Idemudia & Lawrence Ejike Ugwu, 2026. "Psychometric evaluation of the GHQ-28 in a South African recidivist sample," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(8), pages 1-13, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0354025
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0354025
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0354025
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0354025&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0354025?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0354025. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.