IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0353975.html

Comparative evaluation of root canal obturation techniques and sealers in Diabetic Dentin: An in-vitro push-out bond strength test

Author

Listed:
  • Mevlüt Sinan Ocak
  • Mehmet Eskibağlar
  • Mustafa Gündoğar

Abstract

This study evaluated the comparative performance of different root canal obturation approaches using different sealing materials on the push-out bond strength of dentin samples obtained from patients with diabetes mellitus (DM). Forty single-rooted mandibular premolars were instrumented using the Reciproc R40 system and randomly assigned to four groups (n = 10 teeth each): (1) cold lateral compaction with AH Plus, (2) warm vertical compaction with AH Plus, (3) hydraulic single-cone obturation with gutta-percha and Bioserra sealer, and (4) sealer-only technique using the Bioserra bioceramic sealer. After storage at 37°C and 100% humidity for one week, 1-mm slices were prepared from the coronal, middle, and apical thirds and subjected to push-out testing. Data were analyzed using ANOVA and Tukey’s test (p

Suggested Citation

  • Mevlüt Sinan Ocak & Mehmet Eskibağlar & Mustafa Gündoğar, 2026. "Comparative evaluation of root canal obturation techniques and sealers in Diabetic Dentin: An in-vitro push-out bond strength test," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(7), pages 1-11, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0353975
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0353975
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0353975
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0353975&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0353975?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0353975. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.