IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0353935.html

Physically aggressive conspiracy believers often faced various psycho-social problems: Findings from a longitudinal population-based study

Author

Listed:
  • Peter G van der Velden
  • Arno van Dam
  • Jan-Jaap van Eerten
  • Koen P Grootens

Abstract

Objectives: Psychosocial problems are positively associated with beliefs in conspiracy theories and physically aggressive behavior that are mutually related. Yet, it is unknown if adults with (a higher number of) these problems are more often aggressive conspiracy believers, non-physically aggressive conspiracy believers and aggressive non-believers than non-physically aggressive non-believers. The present study aims to fill this gap of knowledge. Methods: Data was extracted from surveys conducted with the Dutch population-based LISS panel assessing six pre-existing psychosocial problems (severe anxiety and depression symptoms, lack of support, exposure to traumatic and stressful life events, financial problems, and low levels of life satisfaction). Furthermore, data was extracted from a survey 5–7 months later assessing conspiracy beliefs and physical aggression. Based on the data of the last survey we distinguished non-physically aggressive non-conspiracy believers, non-physically aggressive believers, physically aggressive non-believers and physically aggressive believers (Ntotal = 1,385). Series of multivariate multinomial logistic regression analyses were conducted with group-membership as dependent variable and (the number of) psychosocial problems as predictors. Results: Results showed that respondents with pre-existing psychosocial problems were much more often aggressive non-conspiracy believers and aggressive conspiracy believers than non-physically aggressive non-believers. Analyses among the physically aggressive believers and non-physically aggressive non-believers revealed that about 64% of the respondents with four or more problems were physically aggressive believers compared to 4% without these problems. The assessed (number of) psychosocial problems did not distinguish non-physically aggressive non-believers and non-physically aggressive believers. Using different cut-offs scores to identify the four groups hardly changed found patterns. Conclusions: Findings indicate that the higher the number of pre-existing psychosocial problems the more adults are prone to be physically aggressive conspiracy believers and, to a lesser extent, physically aggressive non-believers. Results suggest that policies and interventions to reduce violence and the adoption and dispersion of conspiracy beliefs should in any case, besides other potential measures, be aimed at preventing and reducing pre-existing psychosocial problems.

Suggested Citation

  • Peter G van der Velden & Arno van Dam & Jan-Jaap van Eerten & Koen P Grootens, 2026. "Physically aggressive conspiracy believers often faced various psycho-social problems: Findings from a longitudinal population-based study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(9), pages 1-18, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0353935
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0353935
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0353935
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0353935&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0353935?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0353935. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.