IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0353881.html

A preliminary comparison of prosthetic socket liner strain determined using digital image correlation and finite element analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Mohammadreza Freidouny
  • Michael L Madigan
  • Carson Squibb
  • Masaki Hada
  • Abbie Bailey
  • Trevor Johnson
  • Brian Kaluf
  • Michael K Philen

Abstract

Improving prosthetic socket fit remains an important issue among prosthesis users. Understanding strains at limb-socket interface may help prosthetists improve socket fit. Previous studies have used finite element analysis (FEA) to predict stresses and strains at limb-socket interface. However, the selection of FEA model material properties as well as the validation of FEA strain results remain challenging. Digital image correlation (DIC) is a well-accepted optical technique that is widely used in experimental mechanics to noninvasively measure strains and can be used to validate FEA predictions. The goal of this feasibility study was to demonstrate the use of DIC to measure prosthesis liner strains of a unilateral transtibial prosthesis user and conduct a preliminary comparison of these strains with those estimated from an FEA model. One participant with a transtibial residual limb was recruited. Liner strains of the residual limb during two stepping tasks were measured with DIC. An FEA model of the residual limb was also developed, and its estimates of liner strains were compared with DIC measurements. Results showed that mean and probability distributions of principal strain values measured by DIC were in moderate to good agreement with FEA estimations. For example, DIC measured mean maximum and minimum principal strains of 0.041 and 0.021 in the anterior aspect of the residual limb when it was being vertically loaded, and FEA estimated mean maximum and minimum principal strains of 0.051 and 0.027 in the same region. The Bhattacharyya coefficient (a measure of overlap between two probability distributions, with values approaching 1 indicating high similarity) exceeded 0.90 for principal strain distributions between DIC and FEA on the anterior aspect of the residual limb during both tasks. These findings demonstrate that DIC can be used to refine FEA model material properties and results. As such, this methodology may help to advance the design of prosthetic sockets; however, as this study involved a single participant, findings are preliminary and intended to demonstrate methodological feasibility rather than generalize across the broader population of prosthesis users.

Suggested Citation

  • Mohammadreza Freidouny & Michael L Madigan & Carson Squibb & Masaki Hada & Abbie Bailey & Trevor Johnson & Brian Kaluf & Michael K Philen, 2026. "A preliminary comparison of prosthetic socket liner strain determined using digital image correlation and finite element analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(7), pages 1-15, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0353881
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0353881
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0353881
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0353881&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0353881?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0353881. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.