IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0353850.html

Associations between health-related social capital and oral frailty risk among older adults: A stratified analysis by socioeconomic status in the JAGES longitudinal study

Author

Listed:
  • Nanako Tomioka
  • Yuka Iwata
  • Yuko Tanaka
  • Ayuka Yokoyama
  • Kisaki Kobayashi
  • Akemi Matsuzawa
  • Toshiyuki Ojima
  • Etsuko Tadaka

Abstract

Background: Although socioeconomic inequalities in oral health persist despite universal dental care, the role of social determinants remains unclear. Social capital may influence oral frailty, but evidence is limited, particularly regarding individual- and community-level social capital and differences by socioeconomic status (SES). This study examined these associations among community-dwelling older adults. Methods: We analyzed longitudinal data from the Japan Gerontological Evaluation Study (JAGES) collected at baseline (2019) and follow-up (2022), including 31,378 older adults. Social capital was assessed across three domains: civic participation, social cohesion, and reciprocity at individual and community levels. Oral frailty was estimated using a validated predictive model incorporating age, remaining teeth, chewing ability, and swallowing function. Multivariable logistic regression analyses examined associations between individual- and community-level social capital and oral frailty risk, as well as the interaction effects of social capital, stratified by SES, on oral frailty risk across SES groups. All models were adjusted for potential confounders, including sex, age, education, household composition, and chronic conditions. Results: Over three years, 21.6% of participants developed oral frailty risk, with a higher incidence among low-SES participants (24.6%) than among high-SES participants (19.9%). At the higher individual level, higher health-related social capital and social cohesion were significantly associated with lower odds of oral frailty risk across SES groups. Higher civic participation was also associated with lower oral frailty risk across SES groups, with a stronger association observed among low-SES participants. At the community level, higher civic participation was associated with lower oral frailty risk in the overall sample and among low-SES participants. A significant interaction between SES and individual-level civic participation was observed, while no significant interactions were found for other social capital measures. Conclusions: Individual-level health-related social capital was associated with a lower risk of oral frailty among older adults. Furthermore, the inverse association between civic participation and oral frailty was stronger among individuals with low socioeconomic status, suggesting that promoting social participation may be a promising strategy for reducing socioeconomic inequalities in oral frailty.

Suggested Citation

  • Nanako Tomioka & Yuka Iwata & Yuko Tanaka & Ayuka Yokoyama & Kisaki Kobayashi & Akemi Matsuzawa & Toshiyuki Ojima & Etsuko Tadaka, 2026. "Associations between health-related social capital and oral frailty risk among older adults: A stratified analysis by socioeconomic status in the JAGES longitudinal study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(7), pages 1-16, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0353850
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0353850
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0353850
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0353850&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0353850?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0353850. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.