IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0353745.html

Describing well-being in the US by race/ethnicity, education level, and urbanicity: A cross-sectional study using the Gallup National Health and Well Being Index

Author

Listed:
  • Brita Roy
  • Jeph Herrin
  • Erica S Spatz
  • Kiarri N Kershaw
  • Dan Witters
  • Harlan M Krumholz
  • Carley Riley

Abstract

For a more comprehensive understanding of health disparities, consideration must be given not only to morbidity and mortality outcomes but also to more holistic health-related constructs, such as well-being. We assessed differences in well-being across sociodemographic subgroups in the United States (US). We used data from the Gallup National Health and Well-being Index (2014–2016, n = 530,920) to assess independent cross-sectional associations of self-reported race, ethnicity, educational attainment, and rural residence with measures of well-being for non-institutionalized residents from 50 US states and the District of Columbia. Our outcome measures are thriving, calculated from self-reported current and future life evaluation, and the composite Well-Being Index (WBI), calculated from 38 self-reported metrics spanning 5 domains of well-being (Career, Community, Physical, Financial, Social). We summarized these measures for race-education-urban subgroups and tested for interactions among these three factors, before and after adjustment for year of survey completion, age, sex, marital status, household size, and income. Among our sample, 55% were thriving. After adjustment, higher levels of education were associated with increased odds of thriving: compared with those with no high school degree, we found higher odds of thriving for respondents reporting completion of high school/technical school/some college (OR=1.61(1.57,1.66)), college (OR=2.77(2.69,2.85)), and postgraduate (OR=3.38 (3.29,3.49)) education. Compared with White respondents, Black (OR (95% CI)=1.15 (1.12,1.17)) and Hispanic (OR=1.26 (1.23,1.29)) respondents had higher odds of thriving; results were similar for WBI, except Asian respondents had also higher WBI after adjustment for all covariates (OR=2.54 (2.28,2.80)). Across race-education-urban subgroups, non-White respondents with a college degree living in urban and rural areas had the highest odds of thriving; White respondents with no college degree living in urban areas had the lowest odds of thriving (p

Suggested Citation

  • Brita Roy & Jeph Herrin & Erica S Spatz & Kiarri N Kershaw & Dan Witters & Harlan M Krumholz & Carley Riley, 2026. "Describing well-being in the US by race/ethnicity, education level, and urbanicity: A cross-sectional study using the Gallup National Health and Well Being Index," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(9), pages 1-14, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0353745
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0353745
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0353745
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0353745&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0353745?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0353745. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.