IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0353737.html

Knowledge and practice of hemodialysis catheter care and associated factors among patients on maintenance hemodialysis: An analytical cross-sectional study

Author

Listed:
  • Maheda Jilisha Lucas
  • Emmanuel Sumari
  • Joel Seme Ambikile

Abstract

Background: Effective care of hemodialysis catheters (HDCs) is essential for preventing complications, particularly catheter-related infections, among patients receiving maintenance hemodialysis. However, gaps in patient knowledge and practice may compromise optimal catheter care. This study assessed the level of knowledge and practice of HDC care and identified factors associated with these outcomes among patients on maintenance hemodialysis. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted among 97 patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis. Data were collected using a structured questionnaire assessing socio-demographic and clinical characteristics, as well as knowledge and practice related to HDC care. Knowledge and practice scores were categorized using an 80% cutoff. Bivariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to identify factors associated with knowledge and practice. Model fitness and multicollinearity were assessed. Results: Overall, 51.5% of respondents demonstrated satisfactory knowledge, while 45.4% reported satisfactory HDC care practices. Knowledge was highest regarding the purpose and insertion site of the catheter but lower for aspects related to infection recognition and dressing care. In multivariable analysis, female sex (AOR: 3.09; 95%CI: 1.12, 8.54; p = 0.030) and shorter duration on hemodialysis (

Suggested Citation

  • Maheda Jilisha Lucas & Emmanuel Sumari & Joel Seme Ambikile, 2026. "Knowledge and practice of hemodialysis catheter care and associated factors among patients on maintenance hemodialysis: An analytical cross-sectional study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(7), pages 1-14, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0353737
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0353737
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0353737
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0353737&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0353737?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0353737. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.