IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0353687.html

Does language prestige hypothesis hold true across typologically distant languages? A corpus-based study comparing shining-through effect in English-Chinese bidirectional translations

Author

Listed:
  • Jia Li
  • Yunhao Pan

Abstract

While the influence of language prestige on the source language shining through has been well-documented in studies involving typologically similar languages, its impact on typologically distant language pairs remains underexplored. This article examines the interplay between language prestige and typological differences in shaping the shining-through effect, extending the analysis to Chinese-English bidirectional translations. Based on a bidirectional parallel balanced corpus, the study compares the shining-through effect in both Chinese-to-English and English-to-Chinese translations through the application of principal component analysis and flexible discriminant analysis. The findings revealed that the shining-through effect was present in both translation directions but was more pronounced in English-to-Chinese translations. Additionally, the effect varied across registers, with imaginative texts showing a stronger tendency than the informative texts. These results provide further evidence supporting the hypotheses of language prestige, typological distance and risk aversion. A comparison with findings from studies involving typologically closer language pairs further suggests that typological distance may help explain variation in the influence of language prestige on source language shining through. Specifically, the prestige effect appears to be weaker when the source and target languages are typologically more distant, although this interpretation requires direct empirical testing in future research.

Suggested Citation

  • Jia Li & Yunhao Pan, 2026. "Does language prestige hypothesis hold true across typologically distant languages? A corpus-based study comparing shining-through effect in English-Chinese bidirectional translations," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(7), pages 1-25, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0353687
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0353687
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0353687
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0353687&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0353687?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0353687. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.