IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0353683.html

An explainable artificial intelligence framework for clinical decision support in stroke discharge planning

Author

Listed:
  • Seifollah Gholampour
  • Arshia Dehghan
  • Evelyn B Voura
  • Jesse Huang
  • Mohammad Jamshidi
  • George W Koutsouras

Abstract

Background: Stroke, a leading cause of global mortality and disability, requires accurate prediction of discharge outcomes to support early care planning. We developed an explainable artificial intelligence (AI) framework to predict four discharge categories (home, specialized care, home with help, expired) and identify key predictors. Methods: This single-center retrospective study included 1,731 patients with ischemic stroke, hemorrhagic stroke, or transient ischemic attack (TIA). Twenty routinely available electronic health record variables were used. Ten classifiers were compared using stratified 5-fold cross-validation, and the final model was calibrated with training-set out-of-fold predictions and interpreted using SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP). Results: The multilayer perceptron (MLP) achieved the highest mean cross-validated macro-F1 score and was selected as the best-performing model. On the independent hold-out test set, the MLP achieved an accuracy of 0.646, macro-specificity of 0.873, macro-precision of 0.559, macro-sensitivity of 0.557, and macro-F1 of 0.548. Class-wise area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) values were 0.901 for home, 0.874 for specialized care, 0.674 for home with help, and 0.889 for expired. SHAP analysis identified admission National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), length of stay, age, and primary diagnosis as shared predictors across all discharge categories. The SHAP age-threshold analysis identified 72.0 years as a clinically relevant threshold associated with a lower likelihood of home discharge and higher likelihoods of specialized care, home with help, and expired discharge status. The model also highlighted clinically actionable or addressable domains, including blood glucose, depression, insurance type, last known well time, anticoagulant use, and treatment-related variables. Conclusion: This interpretable AI-based framework identified clinically relevant predictors of stroke discharge disposition within this single-center retrospective dataset. These findings may inform future decision-support development; however, clinical implementation, resource optimization, and health-system impact require prospective multicenter validation.

Suggested Citation

  • Seifollah Gholampour & Arshia Dehghan & Evelyn B Voura & Jesse Huang & Mohammad Jamshidi & George W Koutsouras, 2026. "An explainable artificial intelligence framework for clinical decision support in stroke discharge planning," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(7), pages 1-18, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0353683
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0353683
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0353683
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0353683&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0353683?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0353683. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.