IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0353503.html

Character level attention siamese networks for Chinese handwriting comparison

Author

Listed:
  • Li Zhu
  • Long Tang
  • Huaqing Mao

Abstract

Handwriting recognition comparison is a critical yet challenging task in financial, commercial, and exam cheating prevention applications. However, the drawbacks of existing methods are that they compare the whole sentence or the entire signature with multiple characters susceptible to data noise. Their accuracy fluctuates widely. Unlike signature verification which treats the entire signature as a single biometric pattern, or general handwriting comparison which analyzes text at the word or paragraph level, our approach operates at the character level, enabling finer-grained analysis with reduced sensitivity to spacing and alignment variations. In this paper, we propose a character-level attention siamese network for handwriting comparison. The proposed model is a 2-channel CNNs model with multiple spatial-attention convolutional layers. Each channel receives an image of a single Chinese handwriting character. The model outputs the similarity between the two characters. Extensive experiments show that our model’s attention mechanisms and the additional information of characters can effectively reinforce valid information about signature comparisons. Specifically, the proposed CLASN+Fonts model achieves a False Acceptance Rate (FAR) of 11.93%, False Rejection Rate (FRR) of 9.36%, and Accuracy (ACC) of 90.78%, representing a 44.06% reduction in FAR, 42.6% reduction in FRR, and 16.12% improvement in ACC over the baseline SVM method. Since no suitable Chinese character signature dataset is currently available, we collected a large-scale Chinese signature dataset with approximately 48,000 handwritten character images of 800 users and 3,000 character images of 50 fonts. Further analysis of experimental results demonstrates that the proposed methods extract the comparison feature of Chinese character handwriting and select the most informative region automatically during the training.

Suggested Citation

  • Li Zhu & Long Tang & Huaqing Mao, 2026. "Character level attention siamese networks for Chinese handwriting comparison," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(9), pages 1-21, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0353503
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0353503
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0353503
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0353503&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0353503?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0353503. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.