IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0353371.html

Inter-brain functional connectivity: Are we measuring the right thing?

Author

Listed:
  • Juan Camilo Avendano-Diaz
  • Patrick Sothmann
  • Riitta Hari
  • Lauri Parkkonen

Abstract

Hyperscanning—the simultaneous recording of brain activity from multiple individuals—and the study of inter-brain synchronization is gaining popularity in social neuroscience. MEG/EEG hyperscanning studies often estimate inter-brain functional connectivity using phase-based metrics applied to oscillatory brain signals, assuming matching peak frequencies between the individuals studied. However, in reality peak frequencies typically differ between subjects and even between brain regions. Using simulated MEG/EEG signals, we systematically assessed how inter-individual frequency differences affect commonly used connectivity measures. Phase-based metrics were highly sensitive to frequency differences across individuals, whereas amplitude envelope correlation remained comparatively stable under these conditions. Our results underscore the need for connectivity metrics specifically tailored for inter-brain analyses. These findings are relevant to a range of disciplines that are increasingly integrating hyperscanning into their methodological toolkits.

Suggested Citation

  • Juan Camilo Avendano-Diaz & Patrick Sothmann & Riitta Hari & Lauri Parkkonen, 2026. "Inter-brain functional connectivity: Are we measuring the right thing?," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(7), pages 1-11, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0353371
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0353371
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0353371
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0353371&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0353371?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0353371. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.