Author
Listed:
- Yusuke Hiratsuka
- Seok-Joon Yoon
- Sang-Yeon Suh
- Yu Jung Kim
Abstract
Background: An accurate prognostication is crucial for end-of-life decision-making in advanced cancer care. While existing prognostic tools focus on short-term survival (weeks/months), there is a paucity of studies that have examined the long-term prediction at one year. A one-year timeframe is regarded as a general indicator of palliative care referral; however, there are many uncertain issues. This study aimed to develop a one-year survival prediction model using objective parameters for patients with advanced cancer. Methods: This was a secondary analysis of data from a Korean prospective cohort study. Participants, with clinician-predicted survival of ≤1 year, were assessed using clinical data, performance status, laboratory data and chemotherapy response. Recursive partitioning analyses (RPA) were used to identify the prognostic factors and build a prediction model. Results: Of the 200 advanced cancer patients (mean age 64.4, 36% female; 33.5% lung cancer), the median survival was 228 days. Using three variables (chemotherapy response, C reactive protein -Albumin Ratio, and lactate dehydrogenase level), we developed a 4-node survival tree. The model demonstrated an optimism-corrected area under the curve of 0.749 (95% confidence interval: 0.696–0.800) at one year, after 200 bootstrap resampling. The Brier score was 0.161, and the calibration slope was 0.99, indicating high predictive accuracy. Conclusions: We developed an RPA model to facilitate one-year survival prediction in patients with advanced cancer. The 4-leaf model incorporated only three readily available variables. Following external validation, this model may prove valuable in assisting clinicians with one-year survival prognostication.
Suggested Citation
Yusuke Hiratsuka & Seok-Joon Yoon & Sang-Yeon Suh & Yu Jung Kim, 2026.
"Decision tree model to predict one-year survival in ambulatory patients with advanced cancer,"
PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(7), pages 1-10, July.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pone00:0353195
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0353195
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0353195. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.