IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0353180.html

Factors associated with women’s choice for mode of cervical sampling in future cervical cancer screening

Author

Listed:
  • Natalija Berza
  • Jana Zodzika
  • Anda Kivite-Urtane
  • Alise Curkste
  • Ilva Pole
  • Mari Nygard
  • Kersti Parna
  • Anneli Uuskula

Abstract

Background: Cervical cancer (CC), primarily caused by persistent high-risk human papillomavirus (HR-HPV) infection, remains a major public health challenge, with Latvia experiencing substantially higher incidence and mortality rates than the European average. HR-HPV self-sampling is an effective and acceptable screening method, yet some women continue to prefer clinician-collected sampling. Evidence on factors associated with reluctance to adopt self-sampling in the Baltic region is limited. This study examined demographic, socioeconomic, behavioral, and health-related characteristics linked to women’s preferences for future cervical cancer screening modalities. Materials and methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted in Latvia between February 2021 and April 2022. Women attending general practitioners or the Colposcopy Unit of Riga East University Hospital were invited to perform unsupervised HR-HPV self-sampling using written and visual instructions, followed by a structured questionnaire. Collected data included demographic and socioeconomic characteristics, health status, health behaviours, emotional responses to self-sampling, and preferred sampling modality for the next screening round. Descriptive statistics and Chi-square tests were used to assess differences in emotional responses and preferences. Factors associated with preferred sampling modality were identified through univariate and multivariate multinomial logistic regression. Statistical significance was set at p

Suggested Citation

  • Natalija Berza & Jana Zodzika & Anda Kivite-Urtane & Alise Curkste & Ilva Pole & Mari Nygard & Kersti Parna & Anneli Uuskula, 2026. "Factors associated with women’s choice for mode of cervical sampling in future cervical cancer screening," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(7), pages 1-17, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0353180
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0353180
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0353180
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0353180&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0353180?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0353180. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.