IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0352988.html

Can LLMs improve the accuracy of behavior prediction for personnel in high-stakes scenarios by predicting emotions? — A fine-tuning study based on scarce homogeneous cultural data in high-pressure environments

Author

Listed:
  • Yibo Chen
  • Yang Ping
  • Shuhang Zhou
  • Caleb Jojo

Abstract

Research on human behavior prediction using LLMs is increasingly prevalent. This study addresses a key question in the interdisciplinary fields of behavioral science and artificial intelligence: Can LLMs enhance the accuracy of predicting personnel behavior by predicting emotions in high-pressure scenarios? We rigorously screened homogeneous cultural data for personnel in high-stakes roles, constructing the first multidimensional dataset of “scenario-emotion-behavior” under these conditions. Following the fine-tuning of the LLM based on this dataset, we evaluated its behavior prediction accuracy. Experimental results reveal that emotion-predicting LLMs outperform baseline LLMs and behavior-predicting LLMs on multiple metrics, emphasizing the crucial roles of the Emotion-Imbued Choice Model and Behavioral Decision Theory in enhancing LLM behavior prediction capabilities. This study promotes the interdisciplinary integration of AI with cognitive and behavioral science, offering fresh insights into high-risk behavior domains and establishing a novel paradigm where LLMs improve behavior prediction accuracy through emotion prediction.

Suggested Citation

  • Yibo Chen & Yang Ping & Shuhang Zhou & Caleb Jojo, 2026. "Can LLMs improve the accuracy of behavior prediction for personnel in high-stakes scenarios by predicting emotions? — A fine-tuning study based on scarce homogeneous cultural data in high-pressure environments," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(7), pages 1-14, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0352988
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0352988
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0352988
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0352988&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0352988?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0352988. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.