IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0352889.html

Stylistic analysis of translated languages: A perturbation-based XAI deep learning framework

Author

Listed:
  • Dan Feng Huang
  • Dennis Tay

Abstract

Text classification using traditional machine learning techniques has been used in natural language processing (NLP) tasks to distinguish translated from non-translated languages, with high accuracy scores indicating the distinctive style of translated languages. While deep learning (DL) has demonstrated impressive performance in terms of representation learning and capturing nuanced patterns in natural language data, DL models act as black boxes, making their results difficult to interpret. This study addresses this issue by demonstrating an explainable AI (XAI) DL framework in a case study of United Nations (UN) meetings. The framework consists of three stages: i) train a variational autoencoder (VAE) combined with BERT embeddings converted from translated and non-translated texts; ii) utilize the majority vote from three classifiers selected from a stacked ensemble to classify the VAE’s latent representations; iii) implement a perturbation-based XAI method to interpret the DL model’s decisions. The results indicate that the VAE-based model effectively distinguishes the two text types, with accuracy scores above 0.8. The XAI analysis reveals that interpreting the VAE-based model’s decision uncovers stylistic differences between the two text types beyond superficial lexical and syntactic features. This proof-of-concept study demonstrates the potential of the XAI DL framework in other NLP studies that aim to analyze style.

Suggested Citation

  • Dan Feng Huang & Dennis Tay, 2026. "Stylistic analysis of translated languages: A perturbation-based XAI deep learning framework," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(7), pages 1-18, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0352889
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0352889
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0352889
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0352889&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0352889?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0352889. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.