IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0352808.html

Pacing strategy patterns and performance outcomes in marathon running: A large-scale analysis of split time data

Author

Listed:
  • Qizheng Dong
  • Zaidong Li

Abstract

Although pacing strategy is widely recognized as critical for marathon performance, the actual distribution of pacing patterns among recreational runners and their associations with finish time across demographic groups have not been systematically characterized in large samples. This study analyzed split time data (i.e., cumulative elapsed times recorded at intermediate checkpoints including 5K, 10K, 15K, 20K, half-marathon, 25K, 30K, 35K, and 40K) from 78,912 finishers of the Boston Marathon (2015–2017), characterizing pacing profiles using the ratio of first-half to second-half completion times and segment-by-segment pace variations across these nine timing points. Cluster analysis was employed to identify distinct pacing patterns, and the relationships between pacing strategy and finish time were examined across age groups, sex, and performance levels using analysis of variance and multiple regression analysis. Four distinct pacing patterns were identified: even-pacing (maintaining consistent pace throughout; 47.9%), mild positive-splitting (controlled late-race slowing; 31.9%), strong positive-splitting (pronounced late-race slowing; 12.2%), and variable-pacing (highly inconsistent pace fluctuations; 8.0%). Even-pacing was consistently associated with the fastest finish times across age and performance strata (p 20% in the final segment; 85.4%). High-performance runners (

Suggested Citation

  • Qizheng Dong & Zaidong Li, 2026. "Pacing strategy patterns and performance outcomes in marathon running: A large-scale analysis of split time data," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(7), pages 1-22, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0352808
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0352808
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0352808
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0352808&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0352808?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0352808. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.