IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0352756.html

Exploring the association between patient satisfaction and hospital quality in the United States

Author

Listed:
  • Sora Kang
  • Huazhi Liu
  • Charles Ledonio
  • Darwin Ang

Abstract

Background: Patient experience is increasingly used as a public quality metric, but its relationship to hospital safety grades remains incompletely characterized because patient reported experience and technical safety measures capture different dimensions of care. Methods: We performed a retrospective cross-sectional analysis of publicly available hospital level data from 2023. Leapfrog Hospital Safety Grades were linked with Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) patient experience scores. The linked dataset included 1,442 U.S. hospitals; 1,390 hospitals with letter grades A through F were included in grade stratified and regression analyses. HCAHPS domains were analyzed on a 1–5 scale, with higher scores indicating more favorable patient reported experience. One way ANOVA compared mean HCAHPS scores across Leapfrog grades. Multivariable logistic regression with hospital size adjustment evaluated HCAHPS domains associated with Leapfrog Grade A versus grades B through F. Results: Mean HCAHPS domain scores declined across most domains as Leapfrog grades worsened from A to F. In multivariable analysis, nurse communication was associated with higher odds of receiving a Grade A safety rating (odds ratio [OR] 1.54, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.11 to 2.13; p = 0.01), as was the hospital recommendation score (OR 1.54, 95% CI 1.15 to 2.06; p = 0.004). Doctor communication showed an inverse conditional association (OR 0.75, 95% CI 0.59 to 0.97; p = 0.03). Other HCAHPS domains were not independently associated with Grade A after adjustment. Conclusions: Hospitals with higher Leapfrog safety grades generally had more favorable patient reported experience scores, and nurse communication and hospital recommendation were the most clinically interpretable independent predictors of Grade A status. The inverse association for doctor communication should be interpreted cautiously because HCAHPS domains are correlated and the analysis used hospital level cross-sectional data. These findings support the complementary role of patient experience in hospital quality assessment but do not establish causality.

Suggested Citation

  • Sora Kang & Huazhi Liu & Charles Ledonio & Darwin Ang, 2026. "Exploring the association between patient satisfaction and hospital quality in the United States," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(7), pages 1-10, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0352756
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0352756
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0352756
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0352756&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0352756?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0352756. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.