IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0352687.html

Preoperative and perioperative factors that predict graft failure 1 year after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty

Author

Listed:
  • Lucas Mastrangelo
  • Jules Leterrier
  • Christophe Goetz
  • Yinka Zevering
  • Jean-Marc Perone

Abstract

Purpose: To identify pre/perioperative factors that predict graft failure after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK). Methods: This retrospective cohort study included consecutive eyes that underwent DMEK in 2015–2023 in a regional referral hospital and were followed for at least 12 months. DMEK-graft failure was defined as need for regrafting during follow-up. Univariable analysis of graft-failure associations with 20 covariates was performed. Hierarchical multivariable analysis was conducted for DMEK-graft failure with covariates whose univariable-analysis p-values were ≤0.15. Posthoc univariable analyses were performed to elucidate the mechanisms by which covariates promoted DMEK-graft failure. Results: 171 eyes (129 patients) with mostly Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy (94%) were included. Median (range) follow-up was 24 (12–29) months, during which 15 grafts (9%) failed. On univariable analyses, graft failure associated with eight variables, including long (≥25 mm) preoperative axial length (AXL): 40% of graft-failure eyes had AXL ≥ 25 mm vs. 13% for graft-success eyes (p = 0.01). On multivariable analysis, graft failure was predicted by AXL ≥ 25 mm (OR=5.70; 95%CI = 1.27–25.68; p = 0.02), younger graft-donor age (OR=0.93; 95%CI = 0.88–0.99; p = 0.02), graft-unscrolling/positioning difficulties (OR=6.93; 95%CI = 1.58–30.48; p = 0.01), and major graft detachment (OR=6.28; 95%CI = 1.36–28.96; p = 0.02). The model accounted for 14% of total graft-failure variance. Posthoc univariable analysis showed that eyes with AXL ≥ 25 experienced graft-unscrolling/positioning difficulties more often than shorter eyes (27% vs. 10%, p = 0.0497). Conclusions: Eyes with long AXL (≥25 mm) may be more prone to DMEK-graft failure than shorter eyes. This may reflect the deep anterior chamber, which can complicate graft unscrolling and/or graft positioning. The additional graft handling may induce endothelial-cell loss and subsequent graft failure. Younger donor age weakly predicted DMEK-graft failure, possibly due to tighter scrolling of younger grafts. Major graft detachment strongly predicted DMEK-graft failure. This could reflect surgical and/or rebubbling-induced endothelial damage and/or pre-existing graft weakness.

Suggested Citation

  • Lucas Mastrangelo & Jules Leterrier & Christophe Goetz & Yinka Zevering & Jean-Marc Perone, 2026. "Preoperative and perioperative factors that predict graft failure 1 year after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(7), pages 1-22, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0352687
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0352687
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0352687
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0352687&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0352687?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0352687. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.