IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0352599.html

Educational strategies to improve health literacy for people with type 2 diabetes in low socio-economic communities: A realist review protocol

Author

Listed:
  • Namalambo Mwenda - Ng’uni
  • Martin Heine
  • Fastone Goma
  • Monika Martens
  • Miriam Mapulanga - Lisulo
  • Brown Kamanga
  • Inonge Milupi
  • Susan Hanekom

Abstract

Introduction: Type 2 diabetes (T2D) has emerged among the top ten causes of disability and mortality worldwide. Health literacy is crucial for effective self-management to reduce the burden associated with T2D. Studies have reported the effectiveness of educational strategies for improving health literacy to promote good health and well-being. However, contextual factors influence the effectiveness of these strategies. Therefore, this paper intends to explain how and why context shapes the mechanisms through which educational strategies work to improve health literacy for adults with type 2 diabetes in low socioeconomic communities. Methods and analysis: Theory-driven realist review methods will explain how and why contexts activate different mechanisms through which educational strategies work to produce intended or unintended outcomes in low socioeconomic communities. The following five steps of realist review, which are non-linear and iterative, will be undertaken: (i) Define the scope of the review and locate existing theories on educational strategies to improve health literacy, (ii) Develop the initial programme theories, (iii) Search for evidence, (iv) Select papers and appraise, and (v) Extract data and synthesis. The following databases will be searched, but not limited to, PubMed, Education Resource Information Centre (ERIC), and PsycINFO. Papers will be selected based on relevance, richness, and rigour. Data extraction will follow both inductive and deductive approaches. The Intervention-Context-Actor-Mechanism Outcome (ICAMO) configurations will be utilised to analyse and synthesise data using retroductive reasoning. Finally, the revised programme theories, which explain how the educational strategies are expected to work across different contexts in low socioeconomic communities, will be prepared and disseminated. Conclusion: The findings may inform practice, influence policy, and contribute to the design of health literacy programmes in similar settings. The realist review is registered with the Open Science Framework: (https://osf.io/9w867)

Suggested Citation

  • Namalambo Mwenda - Ng’uni & Martin Heine & Fastone Goma & Monika Martens & Miriam Mapulanga - Lisulo & Brown Kamanga & Inonge Milupi & Susan Hanekom, 2026. "Educational strategies to improve health literacy for people with type 2 diabetes in low socio-economic communities: A realist review protocol," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(7), pages 1-20, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0352599
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0352599
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0352599
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0352599&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0352599?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0352599. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.