IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0352359.html

Who gets connected? Open government data and access to intercity innovation networks

Author

Listed:
  • Yutong Liu

Abstract

Who gains access to intercity innovation networks when governments publish data online? We examine this question using the staggered launch of municipal open government data (OGD) platforms across Chinese prefecture-level cities from 2010 to 2023. Using city-pair patent records reconstructed as unique unordered pair-year observations, a difference-in-differences (DID) design estimates a 0.169-log-point increase in intercity joint patenting after platform adoption. This effect is not uniform. The increase is larger among cities with fewer pre-treatment partners and weaker commercial-credit, financial, digital, and market-support environments, precisely where private information channels are thinnest. Platform adoption is also associated with broader partner networks, stronger bilateral ties, and more cross-province collaboration. The evidence is consistent with standardized public information substituting for missing private search, reputation, and verification channels. However, it does not establish portal use as the causal mediator or demonstrate a decline in overall spatial inequality. The findings identify a network-entry margin through which public data infrastructure can generate unequal local returns.

Suggested Citation

  • Yutong Liu, 2026. "Who gets connected? Open government data and access to intercity innovation networks," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(9), pages 1-20, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0352359
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0352359
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0352359
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0352359&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0352359?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0352359. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.