IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0352276.html

Association between patient-reported outcomes and accelerometer-based activity in elderly patients 12 months after proximal humerus fracture: Results from two randomized controlled trials

Author

Listed:
  • Aleksi Reito
  • Rasmus Liukkonen
  • Antti P Launonen
  • Helle K Østergaard
  • Inger Mechlenburg
  • Tore Fjalestad
  • Marianne Toft
  • Ville Mattila

Abstract

Aims: Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) represent outcomes important to patients and are subjective rather than objective measures like mortality or reoperations. Their use has, however, limitations. We aimed to investigate the association between PROMS and accelerometer-based movement in older adults with proximal humerus fractures. Methods: This is a secondary analysis of two previously conducted randomized controlled trials. The first trial included patients aged 60 years or more with any proximal humerus fracture allocated to nonoperative treatment or operative treatment. The second trial included patients aged 60 years or more with a 2-part fracture allocated to different physiotherapy regimes. A subgroup of patients in these trials wore tri-axial accelerometers in both their upper extremities for 4 days at the 1-year follow-up. Functional outcome was measured with Disability of Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH), Constant score, and 15D quality of life questionnaire. Ordinary least squares regression was used to estimate the association between PROMs and accelerometer-based activity. Results: The final study cohort included 100 patients with a mean age of 73 years. Patients were predominantly females (86%) with a 2-part fracture (65%). All activity level categories (inactivity, light, moderate) had a weak association with DASH when adjusted for baseline variables. Based on the confidence intervals, none of the regression coefficients have statistical significance for the association. Similar findings were seen for 15D quality-of-life measurements. Conclusions: Our results show that, in older adults, commonly used PROMs have a negligible and uncertain association with objectively measured upper extremity activity 1 year after a proximal humerus fracture.

Suggested Citation

  • Aleksi Reito & Rasmus Liukkonen & Antti P Launonen & Helle K Østergaard & Inger Mechlenburg & Tore Fjalestad & Marianne Toft & Ville Mattila, 2026. "Association between patient-reported outcomes and accelerometer-based activity in elderly patients 12 months after proximal humerus fracture: Results from two randomized controlled trials," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(8), pages 1-13, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0352276
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0352276
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0352276
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0352276&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0352276?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0352276. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.