IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0352260.html

Clinical efficacy of joint mobilization for shoulder impingement syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Gayeong Lee
  • Hyeonjun Woo
  • Yunhee Han
  • Seungkwan Choi
  • Jungho Jo
  • Junghan Lee
  • Seojae Jeon
  • Wonbae Ha

Abstract

Background: No systematic review has examined the clinical effectiveness of mobilization for shoulder impingement syndrome (SIS). We aimed to evaluate clinical effectiveness for the use of mobilization in SIS. Methods: PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library were searched for studies published up to April 30, 2023. Randomized controlled trials that evaluated the effectiveness of mobilization for SIS were included. Literature was extracted using Endnote 20, and the risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool 2.0. A meta-analysis was conducted using RevMan 5.4. This study was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. Results: Nineteen randomized controlled trials (956 participants) were selected based on the inclusion criteria. Adding mobilization to traditional physical therapy reduced pain (mean difference [MD]=1.72, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.91 to 2.53, I2 = 97%, p

Suggested Citation

  • Gayeong Lee & Hyeonjun Woo & Yunhee Han & Seungkwan Choi & Jungho Jo & Junghan Lee & Seojae Jeon & Wonbae Ha, 2026. "Clinical efficacy of joint mobilization for shoulder impingement syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(7), pages 1-24, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0352260
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0352260
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0352260
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0352260&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0352260?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0352260. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.