IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0352231.html

Optimisation of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) screening algorithm for resource-poor settings using machine learning

Author

Listed:
  • Chamila Mettananda
  • Kaveesha Sivasumithran
  • Lakmali Ranaweera
  • Anjalika Madhubhashini
  • Chamila Ranawaka
  • Arunasalam Pathmeswaran
  • Anuradha Dassanayake

Abstract

Background: The European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL) metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) screening algorithm involves two steps: initial screening with FIB-4, followed by referral for vibration-controlled transient elastography (VCTE) in patients likely to have significant fibrosis (SF). However, VCTE is not widely available in resource-limited settings. Aim: To optimise the EASL MASLD screening algorithm for resource-poor settings using machine learning (ML). Methods: We analysed data from 964 adults aged ≥35 years who underwent VCTE at a tertiary referral centre in Sri Lanka between November 2024 and 2025. Multiple ML models using different methods and variable combinations were trained on 80% of the dataset and tested on the remaining 20%. The best models were selected based on performance and externally validated on data from 430 patients who underwent VCTE before November 2024. Model performance was compared with that of the FIB-4 score using confusion matrices. Results: A Random Forest model incorporating age, AST, ALT, and platelet count separately, rather than using the FIB-4 score, outperformed in predicting SF. The model using all variables showed the best predictive performance for SF, with an AUC-ROC of 0.808. The variables used in the model, in descending order of feature importance, were AST, platelet count, BMI, diabetes mellitus, ALT, age, hypertension, dyslipidaemia, sex, family history, diabetes complication, hypothyroidism, and smoking. External validation of the all-variable model demonstrated an AUC of 0.795 and predicted SF in 9.0% more patients without increasing negative VCTE referrals compared with using the FIB-4 score as the screening tool in the first step of the MASLD screening algorithm. Conclusions: ML-based models were more effective than the FIB-4 score as the first-line screening tool for VCTE referrals, substantially improving the identification of patients with significant fibrosis in this South Asian cohort.

Suggested Citation

  • Chamila Mettananda & Kaveesha Sivasumithran & Lakmali Ranaweera & Anjalika Madhubhashini & Chamila Ranawaka & Arunasalam Pathmeswaran & Anuradha Dassanayake, 2026. "Optimisation of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) screening algorithm for resource-poor settings using machine learning," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(9), pages 1-11, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0352231
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0352231
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0352231
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0352231&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0352231?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0352231. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.