Author
Listed:
- Adam Gaffney
- Kelsey Chalmers
- David U Himmelstein
- Steffie Woolhandler
- Vikas Saini
Abstract
Background: Percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) can be lifesaving for patients with acute coronary syndromes but of lower value for patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD). Previous studies suggest that larger provider supply drives higher healthcare utilization. Whether this is true for lower-value PCI is unknown. Objective: To examine the association between the regional supply of PCI-performing physicians and PCI use and lower-value use. Design: Cross-sectional. Setting: 100% Medicare fee-for-service (FFS) claims and Medicare Advantage encounter data, linked to publicly available sources of population and hospital data. Participants: All Medicare FFS and MA beneficiaries undergoing PCI at US hospitals, 2019–2021. Measurements: Our exposure was the supply of PCI-performing physicians per million population in the hospital-referral-region (HRR). Our primary outcome was lower-value PCI provision defined as the share of all PCIs performed for stable CAD at the hospital-level, unadjusted and with multilevel linear regression adjustment for hospital and regional-population factors. We also examined both PCI use and lower-value use at the regional (HRR) level. Results: Our final dataset included 1,580 hospitals across 306 HRRs with 5,505 PCI-performing physicians. In our primary, hospital-level analysis, the lower-value PCI provision rate averaged 17.3% among hospitals located in HRRs in the lowest quintile of PCI provider density and 22.6% among hospitals in HRRs in the highest quintile. In our fully adjusted model, hospitals in the highest provider density quintile had a 5.77 percentage point higher lower-value provision rate than those in the lowest quintile (95% CI 3.70, 7.84; p
Suggested Citation
Adam Gaffney & Kelsey Chalmers & David U Himmelstein & Steffie Woolhandler & Vikas Saini, 2026.
"Supply of interventional cardiologists and the provision of lower-value Percutaneous Coronary Interventions (PCI),"
PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(7), pages 1-15, July.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pone00:0352150
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0352150
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0352150. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.