IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0352103.html

On the within-person effects of political attitudes on outgroup animosity: Evidence for Democratic-Republican asymmetry

Author

Listed:
  • Yaacov Schul
  • Yoav Ganzach
  • Asya Pazy

Abstract

On the basis of a within-person model of the relationship between political identity and outgroup dislike, Brandt and Vallabha (2025) suggested that changes in the strength of party identity, but not changes in the direction of this identity, are correlated with political animosity. These results are particularly interesting since they are consistent with the symmetric view of political ideology, which argues that partisans are similarly intolerant toward their political opponents. In this paper, we highlight conceptual and methodological issues that cast doubt on the validity of BV’s conclusions. We also propose an alternative model and apply it to BV’s data, alongside data from a second large dataset. Our findings indicate that Democratic and Republican respondents differ in the effect of identity strength on animosity, a result which is consistent with the asymmetric, rather than the symmetric, view. We conclude by discussing the methodological and conceptual insights gleaned from these findings.

Suggested Citation

  • Yaacov Schul & Yoav Ganzach & Asya Pazy, 2026. "On the within-person effects of political attitudes on outgroup animosity: Evidence for Democratic-Republican asymmetry," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(9), pages 1-14, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0352103
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0352103
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0352103
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0352103&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0352103?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0352103. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.