IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0352075.html

Harmonizing the National Lung Screening Trial: Kernel resolution and field of view compensation

Author

Listed:
  • Aravind R Krishnan
  • Michael E Kim
  • Chenyu Gao
  • Gaurav Rudravaram
  • Trent Schwartz
  • Andre T S Hucke
  • Lucas W Remedios
  • Thomas Z Li
  • Kaiwen Xu
  • Kim L Sandler
  • Yency Forero Martinez
  • Sanja Antic
  • Fabien Maldonado
  • Lianrui Zuo
  • Bennett A Landman

Abstract

Low-dose chest computed tomography scans acquired in multi-centre studies exhibit heterogeneity in the form of varying spatial resolution, reconstruction kernel and semantic field-of-view that hinder the reproducibility of quantitative measures and generalizability of downstream analyses. The National Lung Screening Trial (NLST) provides a large, open collection of low-dose chest CT scans characterized by heterogeneous spatial resolution, reconstruction kernels and field-of-view configurations. This diversity presents an opportunity to standardize the data, enabling reproducible biomarker estimation and broader reuse of the NLST as a homogeneous quantitative imaging resource. In this work, we present a standardization pipeline that was applied to 105,191 scans from 23,669 participants in the NLST. The pipeline addresses the following elements: (1) Resampling through-axial-plane (z) spatial resolution to 1.0 mm (2) Harmonization of reconstruction kernels across intra-vendor (paired) and inter-vendor (unpaired) settings using an anatomy guided multipath cycleGAN where scans were mapped to a reference Siemens B30f (soft) and Siemens B50f (hard) kernel (3) Semantic field-of-view extension across all scans. Quantitative consistency across percent emphysema and body composition assessment (skeletal muscle and subcutaneous adipose tissue volumes) was evaluated in paired, cross-sectional and longitudinal settings. For paired data, harmonization improved agreement of quantitative measures relative to the soft kernel reference. Cross-sectional analyses demonstrated reduced inter-kernel variability, with small to medium effect sizes (Cohen’s d = 0.2 to 0.5) for percent emphysema and improved correlations with anthropometric measures post field-of-view extension. Longitudinal analysis using linear mixed effect models, showed reduced kernel bias and improved longitudinal consistency of biomarkers reflected by the increase in intraclass correlation coefficients. This work provides a harmonized NLST imaging resource that enables consistent and reliable quantitative biomarker estimation for lung cancer screening, with open source code released at https://github.com/MASILab/Harmonized_NLST_dataset and the harmonized dataset to be made publicly available once data return to the NLST is completed.

Suggested Citation

  • Aravind R Krishnan & Michael E Kim & Chenyu Gao & Gaurav Rudravaram & Trent Schwartz & Andre T S Hucke & Lucas W Remedios & Thomas Z Li & Kaiwen Xu & Kim L Sandler & Yency Forero Martinez & Sanja Anti, 2026. "Harmonizing the National Lung Screening Trial: Kernel resolution and field of view compensation," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(10), pages 1-30, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0352075
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0352075
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0352075
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0352075&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0352075?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0352075. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.