IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0352031.html

Dried blood spot 3-year stability suitability for biomarker discovery and biobanking initiatives in companion animals

Author

Listed:
  • Kelli D Goodman
  • Joshua Wilson
  • Matthew Mitchell
  • Alison Colyer
  • Richard Haydock
  • Brian Keppler
  • Anne M Evans
  • David Allaway

Abstract

Dried blood spot (DBS) sampling is a rapid, cost-effective, and sustainable method that requires minimal processing. It can be performed using remnant blood samples from clinics or via pinprick at home. The DBS metabolome has similar discriminatory potential to the plasma metabolome, making it suitable for biomarker discovery. This study evaluated the suitability of DBS for long-term storage and its potential for biomarker discovery from companion animal (cats and dogs) biobanks using two different approaches. Objective 1 assessed whether two independent metabolic profiling analyses using duplicate DBS card samples, conducted three years apart would provide similar phenotype discrimination. Objective 2 evaluated the potential to combine independent metabolomics datasets through a bridging sample, facilitating insights from prospective biobanks and enabling the reuse of previously acquired data. Using 54 samples from 5 phenotypic classes (1 cat breed and 4 dog breeds), after three years of storage at −80°C, the DBS metabolome showed a 7% reduction (782–728 metabolites). A thorough investigation indicated that this was likely due to experimental variation rather than time-dependent sample instability. Despite data loss, classification remained consistent across independent datasets using various approaches. Hierarchical cluster analysis (HCA) demonstrated correct pairing of individuals between runs for 81% of individuals. Partial least squares-discriminant analysis and Random Forest (RF) utilized many of the same metabolites to discriminate between classes and RF also accurately predicted blinded samples with similar probability in both runs. RF and HCA analyses of merged data performed well, with RF correctly predicting breed for two blinded samples and HCA correctly pairing 76% of individuals. These findings indicate that quality control samples can be used to normalize independent metabolomics studies to a similar baseline enabling combined analysis at a future time. Overall, the data support DBS as a suitable sample for several years of storage in biobanks, with minimal data loss, making it viable for biomarker discovery. Implementing DBS sampling of remnant blood can accelerate research activities, and merging data through suitable bridging samples can enhance the reuse of metabolome data, providing additional biological and economic value.

Suggested Citation

  • Kelli D Goodman & Joshua Wilson & Matthew Mitchell & Alison Colyer & Richard Haydock & Brian Keppler & Anne M Evans & David Allaway, 2026. "Dried blood spot 3-year stability suitability for biomarker discovery and biobanking initiatives in companion animals," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(8), pages 1-16, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0352031
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0352031
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0352031
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0352031&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0352031?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0352031. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.