Author
Abstract
While deep clustering has made significant strides, the inherent overconfidence of Softmax-based calibration remains a critical bottleneck. Even dedicated frameworks like Calibrated Deep Clustering (CDC) fail to fully eliminate this issue, as they continue to rely on probability-based metrics. These relative metrics are constrained by inter-class normalization, which often forces high confidence scores onto ambiguous samples where discriminative features are underdeveloped. To address this limitation, we propose PEC-CDC, a novel framework that reconfigures the CDC architecture by replacing its probability-based calibration head with a regression-based Prediction Error-based Classification (PEC) head. Our core motivation is that prediction error serves as an absolute measure of distributional support independent of other classes, making it inherently resistant to overconfidence. Specifically, we utilize a frozen Teacher-Student module to shift the model’s evaluation from relative confidence probability to absolute sample–cluster distribution consistency. Qualitative analysis via t-SNE and error distribution visualizations confirms that our framework establishes superior semantic boundaries and compact cluster manifolds. Extensive experiments demonstrate that PEC-CDC achieves state-of-the-art performance; notably, on the challenging CIFAR-100 dataset, it attains an Adjusted Rand Index (ARI) of 45.61%, effectively quadrupling the performance of leading baselines such as CueCo.
Suggested Citation
Ziyang Li, 2026.
"PEC-CDC: A prediction error-based calibration framework for robust unsupervised deep clustering,"
PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(6), pages 1-25, June.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pone00:0351959
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0351959
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0351959. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.