IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0351938.html

“Shining a light on chronic pain”: A qualitative study of stakeholder views towards chronic pain at work and the Pain-at-Work Toolkit

Author

Listed:
  • Angela Claire Thornton
  • Elaine Wainwright
  • Wendy J Chaplin
  • Victoria Abbott-Fleming
  • Daniel F McWilliams
  • David A Walsh
  • Gordon Taylor
  • Paul McNamee
  • Karen Walker-Bone
  • Holly Blake

Abstract

Purpose: The study explored the views of organisational stakeholders who participated in the feasibility trial of the Pain-at-Work Toolkit towards the implementation of the toolkit in ‘real-world’ workplace settings. This digital toolkit was co-created with healthcare professionals, employers, and people with chronic pain and aimed to inform and enable individuals to self-manage their chronic pain at work. Design/methodology/approach: A qualitative study using semi-structured interviews with 15 stakeholders from 12 organisations that participated in a feasibility trial of the Pain-at-Work Toolkit. Purposive sampling was used to ensure the inclusion of stakeholders with management or supportive roles who have responsibility for the health and wellbeing of employees. Findings: The findings illuminate three key themes: not all disabilities are visible; not all line managers are equal; and who has control? These surmise that invisible disabilities such as chronic pain are underestimated, poorly understood, and inconsistently provisioned for in organisational policies. It highlights the key role that line managers play in employee disclosure and access to support but demonstrates that line managers vary in their delivery of support to employees. Lastly, it explores stakeholder perceptions of the roles of the employer relative to the employee with chronic pain. It confirms the need for additional resources to plug organisational gaps and give workers tools to self-manage their pain at work. Originality: This study indicates the need for resources / supports to upskill line managers so they can intervene to proactively support employees with chronic pain to reduce sickness absence and presenteeism (working when unwell). The research demonstrates organisational stakeholders’ interest in a multi-faceted approach to help employees self-manage chronic pain in all types at work, such as that provided by the Pain-at-Work Toolkit. In addition, it clearly identifies the potential for complementary resources to educate and facilitate line managers to better support their staff.

Suggested Citation

  • Angela Claire Thornton & Elaine Wainwright & Wendy J Chaplin & Victoria Abbott-Fleming & Daniel F McWilliams & David A Walsh & Gordon Taylor & Paul McNamee & Karen Walker-Bone & Holly Blake, 2026. "“Shining a light on chronic pain”: A qualitative study of stakeholder views towards chronic pain at work and the Pain-at-Work Toolkit," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(7), pages 1-25, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0351938
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0351938
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0351938
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0351938&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0351938?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0351938. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.