IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0351878.html

Harms of massage in persons with cancer or receiving treatment for cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Nicolas Kjerulf
  • Jan Christensen
  • Mikael Rørth
  • Anders Larsen
  • Kira Bloomquist

Abstract

Introduction: Massage is widely used in cancer survivors. However, formal assessment of potential harms is lacking. The aim of this study is to assess harms related to massage. Materials and methods: This systematic review and meta-analysis included studies that compared massage with control conditions, in people with- and/or receiving treatment for cancer. The primary outcome was adverse events. Ten databases and trials registries were searched up to 22 October 2024. Quality of adverse events reporting was assessed as adherence to the CONSORT statement extension for reporting of harms. Studies reporting on adverse events were assessed for risk of bias using the PEDro scale (randomized controlled/ cross-over trials) and ROBINS-I (quasi-experimental and cohort) and were eligible for meta-analysis (random-effect). The study was registered at PROSPERO (CRD42023352993). Results: Sixty-three intervention studies were included, of which 53% (n = 34 studies) did not report on adverse events. Twenty-nine studies (n = 2699) reported on adverse events explicity and/or as study discontinuation. Of these, no studies assessed deep massage, with most interventions using light massage. Meta-analyses indicated no evidence of a higher risk of adverse events related to massage compared to usual care/attention control. Three cohort studies (n = 1406) were included, two of which (both with critical risk of bias) found significant associations between massage over tumor site and negative survival outcomes, in patients with osteosarcoma. Overall, the quality of adverse events reporting was poor, and certainty of evidence considered very low. Conclusion: Results indicate that light to moderate intensity massage in people living with- and/or receiving treatment for cancer can be performed without increased risk of harms. Contraindications for massage should be applied as per the general population. Due to uncertainty as to whether massage over tumor in osteosarcoma constitutes an increased risk of negative survival outcomes, massage directly on tumor is discouraged, though definitive evidence is lacking.

Suggested Citation

  • Nicolas Kjerulf & Jan Christensen & Mikael Rørth & Anders Larsen & Kira Bloomquist, 2026. "Harms of massage in persons with cancer or receiving treatment for cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(8), pages 1-24, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0351878
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0351878
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0351878
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0351878&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0351878?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0351878. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.