IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0351859.html

Pharmaceutical Innovation and Drug Policy: The Case of the 1984 Hatch-Waxman Act

Author

Listed:
  • Benjamin M Blau
  • Joshua Lyman
  • Jason M Smith
  • Ryan J Whitby

Abstract

This paper examines the effect of the 1984 Hatch-Waxman Act and its 2003 amendment – the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act – on the level of innovation in pharmaceutical firms. In part, the purpose of these policies was to balance the exclusivity rights of pioneer drug manufacturers with generic drug competition, which would allow for more consumer affordability. Using difference-in-difference regression analysis, we analyze how, relative to innovation in other industries, pharmaceutical innovation changes surrounding the implementation of the two laws. Results from several difference-in-difference tests show that, relative to non-pharmaceutical firms, research and development (R&D) in pharmaceutical firms markedly increased during the post-Hatch-Waxman period. We do not find, however, that the 2003 amendment directly influenced pharmaceutical innovation. If anything, the latter policy was associated with a reduction in innovation. These findings seem to suggest that the level of pharmaceutical innovation is highly sensitive to changes in policy that might change the incentives for firms to innovate.

Suggested Citation

  • Benjamin M Blau & Joshua Lyman & Jason M Smith & Ryan J Whitby, 2026. "Pharmaceutical Innovation and Drug Policy: The Case of the 1984 Hatch-Waxman Act," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(7), pages 1-16, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0351859
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0351859
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0351859
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0351859&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0351859?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0351859. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.