IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0351713.html

Global prevalence of impostor phenomenon in medical students: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Víctor Juan Vera-Ponce
  • Christian Humberto Huaman-Vega
  • Fiorella E Zuzunaga-Montoya
  • César Iván Guerrero Uceda
  • Darwin A León-Figueroa
  • Oriana Rivera-Lozada
  • Edwin Aguirre-Milachay
  • Carmen Inés Gutierrez De Carrillo
  • Mario J Valladares-Garrido

Abstract

Introduction: Impostor phenomenon (IP) is a psychological phenomenon in which successful individuals fail to internalize their achievements and fear being exposed as “incompetent.” Medical students may be particularly vulnerable to IP because medical training combines repeated high-stakes assessment, competitive peer comparison, hierarchical clinical supervision, and rapid professional identity transition, potentially affecting psychological well-being and academic performance. Objective: To estimate the global prevalence of IP in pre-licensure medical students and analyze differences by sex, academic stage, and geographic region. Methods: A systematic search was conducted in MEDLINE/PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and EMBASE, including studies published between January 1, 2000, and June 30, 2025. Observational studies reporting IP prevalence in pre-licensure medical students using validated instruments were selected. Pooled prevalences were calculated using random-effects meta-analysis, with subgroup analyses and meta-regression by publication year. Results: Thirty-five studies were included for qualitative synthesis, with 26 studies (n = 9,110 students) employing the Clance Impostor Phenomenon Scale (CIPS) included in the primary meta-analysis. The global CIPS-based prevalence was 54.2% (95% CI: 47.0%−61.3%) with high heterogeneity (I² = 98%). Studies using probabilistic sampling (n = 4) reported 36.5% prevalence, while non-probabilistic sampling (n = 22) yielded 57.5%. Prevalence was similar between women (50.5%) and men (47.1%), and between preclinical (48.9%) and clinical (46.8%) students. The highest rates were observed in the United Arab Emirates (89.5%), Canada (75.8%), and the United Kingdom (66.0%), while Peru presented the lowest estimate among CIPS studies (30.6%). Meta-regression showed no significant temporal trend from 2018–2024 (β = 0.0221, p = 0.1747). Conclusions: IP was frequent among pre-licensure medical students, although pooled estimates should be interpreted cautiously because heterogeneity was substantial and prevalence varied by sampling method and geographic context. These findings support the need for standardized measurement, probabilistic sampling when feasible, longitudinal research, and rigorously evaluated interventions addressing both individual coping and institutional educational practices.

Suggested Citation

  • Víctor Juan Vera-Ponce & Christian Humberto Huaman-Vega & Fiorella E Zuzunaga-Montoya & César Iván Guerrero Uceda & Darwin A León-Figueroa & Oriana Rivera-Lozada & Edwin Aguirre-Milachay & Carmen Inés, 2026. "Global prevalence of impostor phenomenon in medical students: A systematic review and meta-analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(8), pages 1-21, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0351713
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0351713
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0351713
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0351713&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0351713?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0351713. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.