Author
Listed:
- Davina Sharma
- Shané J Gill
- Lizbeth Goodman
- Amanda Rabinowitz
- Louis N Hunter
- Reinhard Schaler
- Kirby Wycoff
Abstract
Introduction: Traumatic brain injury is increasingly recognized as a chronic condition requiring long-term rehabilitation and coordinated care beyond the acute phase. Across Europe, substantial variation exists in healthcare system organization, funding structures, and service delivery models, which may influence access to rehabilitation and long-term functional outcomes for adults with chronic moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury. The objective of this scoping review protocol is to systematically characterize systemic factors and management practices that shape rehabilitation access, continuity of care, and recovery outcomes across European healthcare systems. This review will map published evidence on health management practices influencing chronic traumatic brain injury rehabilitation in Europe and identify gaps for future research. Methods and Analysis: This review will follow the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology for scoping reviews. A comprehensive search of PubMed, Scopus, Ovid, and CINAHL will identify studies published between 2018 and 2025 involving adults aged 18 years or older who are at least 1-year post-injury. Studies examining health management practices (i.e., individual, organization, and systemic factors) within European healthcare context will be included. Two reviewers will independently screen articles using predefined inclusion criteria and documented using a Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews flow diagram. Data will be synthesized descriptively through tables, figures, and narrative summaries to map existing evidence and identify gaps in the literature.
Suggested Citation
Davina Sharma & Shané J Gill & Lizbeth Goodman & Amanda Rabinowitz & Louis N Hunter & Reinhard Schaler & Kirby Wycoff, 2026.
"Health management practices in chronic traumatic brain injury rehabilitation: A scoping review protocol,"
PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(6), pages 1-8, June.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pone00:0351635
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0351635
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0351635. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.