Author
Listed:
- Jinxing Dai
- Hao Qiu
- Liran Shen
- Qianjin Shi
- Kang Shen
- Qingkai Wang
- Weibing Qiu
Abstract
Objective: Early differentiation of pediatric acute respiratory infections in outpatient and emergency settings is often hindered by nonspecific clinical signs, leading to unnecessary empirical antibiotic use and avoidable radiation exposure. Therefore, this study aimed to develop and internally evaluate an early triage model to distinguish pediatric bronchopneumonia (BP) from uncomplicated upper respiratory tract infection using routine, cost-effective laboratory parameters analyzed with machine-learning algorithms. Methods: This retrospective study consecutively enrolled 532 pediatric patients who presented with mild respiratory symptoms at their initial visit, comprising 218 in the BP group and 314 in the Upper Respiratory Tract Infection (URTI) group. Core laboratory indicators were selected using a dual-dimensionality reduction strategy that integrated the Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) regression with the Boruta algorithm. Seven machine learning classifiers were then constructed and compared based on the resulting feature matrix. The Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) framework was subsequently applied to interpret the nonlinear predictive mechanisms of the optimal model. Results: This study constructed seven machine learning models: Logistic Regression (LR), Decision Tree (DT), Random Forest (RF), Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), Lightweight Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM), Support Vector Machine (SVM), and Artificial Neural Network (ANN). In the internal validation set, the SVM model demonstrated favorable predictive performance, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.921 (95% confidence interval: 0.874–0.959). Based on Platt-scaled probability estimates, the SVM model showed the lowest Brier score among the evaluated models, with a Brier score of 0.112. Decision curve analysis confirmed this model’s positive net clinical benefit across a broad range of threshold probabilities. SHAP analysis further elucidated the nonlinear contribution weights of multiple conventional parameters at specific physiological thresholds. Conclusions: The multidimensional SVM risk quantification model, based on nine routine laboratory parameters, provides an accurate and objective assessment of pediatric BP risk. This model holds significant potential for clinical translation as a noninvasive, cost-effective triage tool in emergency departments. Its application could effectively reduce unnecessary radiographic screening and excessive antibiotic use.
Suggested Citation
Jinxing Dai & Hao Qiu & Liran Shen & Qianjin Shi & Kang Shen & Qingkai Wang & Weibing Qiu, 2026.
"Explainable machine learning for the early differentiation of pediatric bronchopneumonia using routine laboratory parameters,"
PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(7), pages 1-16, July.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pone00:0351509
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0351509
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0351509. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.