IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0351499.html

Evaluating the knowledge of stroke management among the non-neurological healthcare professionals in an underdeveloped county in Southwestern China

Author

Listed:
  • Xia Huang
  • Yuanbin Zhao
  • Shiquan Wang
  • Chao Lin
  • Li Xie
  • Ping Li
  • Xilin Liu
  • Zihan He
  • Lili Yang

Abstract

Objective: This study aims to investigate the knowledge of stroke management among non-neurological healthcare professionals (HCPs) in an underdeveloped county in western China. Methods: The study proceeded in two phases. First, the Acute Stroke Management Questionnaire (ASMaQ) underwent a systematic intercultural adaptation into Chinese, followed by an evaluation of its psychometric properties. Second, a cross‑sectional survey using the adapted Chinese ASMaQ was administered to non‑neurological HCPs working in an underdeveloped county in southwestern China. A convenience sampling method was used in the recruitment. Demographic information, including age, gender, years of service, job position (doctor/nurse), department, professional level, medical facility level (comprehensive hospital/noncomprehensive medical facility), and whether the participant had a neurologist partner or not during routine practice, was collected. The internal consistency was then measured with Cronbach’s α. Further statistical analyses were conducted to identify potential influencing factors of the ASMaQ score. Results: After a standardized intercultural adaptation and evaluation process, a reliable localized Chinese version of ASMaQ was obtained, with an overall Cronbach’s α value of 0.77. A total of 252 HCPs completed the questionnaires, and 225 qualified questionnaires were included in the statistical analysis. The results revealed that the rate of good performance of overall ASMaQ among non-neurological HCPs was 69.4%. For the three subscales of ASMaQ, the rates of good performance for general stroke knowledge (GSK), hyperacute stroke management (HSM), and advanced stroke management (ASM) were 73.3%, 64.7%, and 70.1%, respectively. Furthermore, we found that the factors influencing the overall ASMaQ score were primarily gender, job position, medical facility level, and with/without neurologist partners. Specifically, females performed worse than males did (106.7 ± 7.7 vs. 110 ± 8.1; P = 0.003), nurses performed worse than doctors did (106.3 ± 7.6 vs. 110.0 ± 7.9; P

Suggested Citation

  • Xia Huang & Yuanbin Zhao & Shiquan Wang & Chao Lin & Li Xie & Ping Li & Xilin Liu & Zihan He & Lili Yang, 2026. "Evaluating the knowledge of stroke management among the non-neurological healthcare professionals in an underdeveloped county in Southwestern China," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(6), pages 1-14, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0351499
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0351499
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0351499
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0351499&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0351499?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0351499. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.