IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0351413.html

Comparative effectiveness of horticultural therapy modalities for cognitive function and depressive symptoms in older adults with cognitive impairment: Protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Jingjing Yan
  • Weihua Li
  • Yingjie Shen
  • Qiyuan Lyu
  • Suwen Hu
  • Nan Xu

Abstract

Introduction: Cognitive impairment in older adults is often accompanied by depressive symptoms, leading to reduced quality of life and increased risk of disability and mortality. Horticultural therapy has been increasingly used as a non-pharmacological intervention; however, its effectiveness may vary across different intervention modalities and delivery characteristics. Existing meta-analyses have primarily focused on overall effects and have not compared different horticultural therapy modalities. This study aims to evaluate and rank the comparative effectiveness of horticultural therapy delivered through different modalities using a network meta-analysis. Methods and analysis: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving older adults with cognitive impairment will be included. The intervention group will receive horticultural therapy in addition to routine care, while the control group will receive routine care alone. Eight databases (PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Web of Science, CINAHL, PsycINFO, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), and Wanfang Database) will be searched from inception to May 2026. Interventions will be classified based on delivery characteristics, including environmental settings, cultivation substrates, and levels of participant engagement. Primary outcomes are cognitive function and depressive symptoms. Two reviewers will independently perform study selection, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool. Pairwise meta-analysis and frequentist network meta-analysis will be conducted using the R (package “netmeta”), and treatment rankings will be estimated using surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) values. Ethics and dissemination: Ethical approval is not required. Findings will be disseminated through a peer-reviewed publication. Trial registration: PROSPERO registration number: CRD420251185714.

Suggested Citation

  • Jingjing Yan & Weihua Li & Yingjie Shen & Qiyuan Lyu & Suwen Hu & Nan Xu, 2026. "Comparative effectiveness of horticultural therapy modalities for cognitive function and depressive symptoms in older adults with cognitive impairment: Protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(6), pages 1-12, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0351413
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0351413
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0351413
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0351413&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0351413?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0351413. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.