IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0351293.html

Trends and determinants of acute tocolysis implementation in Japan, 2012–2023: An 11-year nationwide retrospective cohort study

Author

Listed:
  • Mikayo Toba
  • Rie Oi
  • Mutsuko Moriwaki
  • Masayuki Kakehashi
  • Ayako Fudono
  • Kiyohide Fushimi
  • Naoyuki Miyasaka

Abstract

Background: International guidelines, such as those from the WHO, recommend limiting the duration of tocolysis to up to 48 hours in order to provide a window for antenatal corticosteroid administration and maternal transfer. However, reports from multiple countries indicate that tocolysis is being performed for 48 hours or longer in actual clinical settings. This study used nationwide data in Japan over an 11-year period to investigate changes in tocolytic protocol and identify factors associated with tocolysis within 48 hours. Methods: Using the Diagnosis Procedure Combination database, we analyzed data from 156,356 pregnant women who received ritodrine infusion for preterm labor between April 2012 and March 2023. To accommodate day-based administrative data, we defined acute tocolysis (AT) as ≤2 and maintenance tocolysis (MT) as ≥4 days of treatment. Annual trends in AT utilization rates were examined, and logistic regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with AT, including institutional characteristics, regional differences, and obstetric complications. Results: The rate of AT utilization increased from 15.73% to 23.74% over the study period, as did variation among hospitals. University hospitals (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.16), perinatal centers (aOR = 1.12), preterm premature rupture of membranes (aOR = 3.18), and pregnancy-induced hypertension (aOR = 1.52) were associated with AT, while concomitant use of magnesium sulfate hydrate (aOR = 0.91), multiple fetuses (aOR = 0.64), and placenta previa (aOR = 0.67) were negatively associated with AT utilization. Conclusions: While AT utilization has increased over time, significant disparities between facilities remain. These findings suggest that the choice of tocolytic protocol is not determined by evidence alone, but is complexly influenced by institutional roles, regional healthcare systems, and specific maternal complications. This study highlights the importance of understanding these multifaceted factors to optimize treatment strategies that balance international standards with the practicalities of individualized patient care.

Suggested Citation

  • Mikayo Toba & Rie Oi & Mutsuko Moriwaki & Masayuki Kakehashi & Ayako Fudono & Kiyohide Fushimi & Naoyuki Miyasaka, 2026. "Trends and determinants of acute tocolysis implementation in Japan, 2012–2023: An 11-year nationwide retrospective cohort study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(6), pages 1-12, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0351293
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0351293
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0351293
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0351293&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0351293?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0351293. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.