IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0351242.html

Spontaneous passage of common bile duct stones: predictive factors and impact on post-ERCP complications

Author

Listed:
  • Wasuwit Wanchaitanawong
  • Phichayut Phinyo
  • Thanaput Kunlayawutipong
  • Nawapol Chatkul
  • Phuripong Kijdamrongthum
  • Nithi Thinrungroj

Abstract

Background: Spontaneous passage of common bile duct stones (CBDSs) may render endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) unnecessary. Although predictors of passage have been described, most prior studies were limited by a small number of events, and the impact of spontaneous passage on post-ERCP complications remains under-investigated. This study aimed to identify clinical predictors of spontaneous passage and evaluate its association with post-ERCP complications. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients diagnosed with CBDSs who underwent endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) or ERCP at a tertiary referral center. Spontaneous passage was defined as the absence of stones confirmed during the procedure. Multivariable risk regression was used to identify predictors of passage and to assess the association between spontaneous passage and post-ERCP complications. Results: Spontaneous passage was observed in 113 of 404 patients (28%). Independent predictors of spontaneous passage included younger age (RR 0.88 per 10 years; 95% CI 0.81–0.96), smaller CBDS size (RR 0.78 per 1 mm; 95% CI 0.71–0.85), and single CBDS (RR 1.64; 95% CI 1.04–2.61). Regarding complications, post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) occurred more frequently in patients with spontaneous passage compared to those without (16.5% vs 7.6%, P = 0.01). After adjusting for relevant confounders, including procedural factors, spontaneous passage remained an independent risk factor for PEP (RR 2.48, 95% CI 1.25–4.92). Conclusions: Spontaneous passage of CBDSs is an independent risk factor for PEP. Younger age, smaller stone size, and a single stone are significant predictors of passage. These findings suggest that pre-procedural risk stratification and non-invasive confirmation of ductal clearance may be beneficial in selecting appropriate candidates, potentially reducing unnecessary ERCP and associated complications.

Suggested Citation

  • Wasuwit Wanchaitanawong & Phichayut Phinyo & Thanaput Kunlayawutipong & Nawapol Chatkul & Phuripong Kijdamrongthum & Nithi Thinrungroj, 2026. "Spontaneous passage of common bile duct stones: predictive factors and impact on post-ERCP complications," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(7), pages 1-13, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0351242
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0351242
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0351242
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0351242&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0351242?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0351242. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.