IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0351080.html

Out-of-pocket expenditure experienced by couples seeking In Vitro Fertilization (IVF) services at tertiary care facilities in India

Author

Listed:
  • Prerana Patil
  • Akshita Vikani
  • Deepshikha Sharma
  • Oshima Sachin
  • Biju Soman
  • Bhavani Shankara Bagepally
  • Renu Tanwar
  • Vanita Suri
  • V Radha
  • M Anitha
  • P Ramesh
  • Deepti Shrivastava
  • Sukhpreet Patel
  • Shankar Prinja
  • Beena Joshi1
  • IVF Project Team

Abstract

Objective: Out-of-pocket expenditure (OOPE) incurred by infertile couples seeking In Vitro Fertilization (IVF) treatment in selected public and private hospitals in India. Design: Cross-sectional observational study. Setting: Two private and three public tertiary care hospitals across varied geographical regions of India that provide IVF services. Participants: A total of 148 couples undergoing IVF were enrolled via semi-purposive consecutive sampling over a six-month period after providing informed written consent. Primary outcome measures: Using validated structured tool, direct health costs (procedures, drugs, diagnostics), non-medical costs (travel, food, lodging), and indirect costs (loss of wages) were explored. Catastrophic health expenditure (CHE) and predictors of OOPE were also assessed. Results: The mean OOPE per IVF cycle was ₹1,10,104 (±₹75,503) [~USD 1,321(±906)] in public hospitals and ₹2,30,668 (±₹1,09,556) [~USD 2,768 (±1315)] in private hospitals. The majority of expenses were on drugs and diagnostics. Approximately 30% of couples experienced CHE, with drug costs contributing 55% of total expenditure. Only 5% had insurance coverage, with an average cover of ₹1,00,625 (±35,500) [~USD 1,208 (± 426)]. Over half (58%) relied on external financial support, mostly from friends and family.Couples without insurance had significantly higher OOPE than those with coverage (p=0.029). Higher household income was also linked to increased OOPE (p=0.001). Couples undergoing treatment at private facilities had 7.7 (CI: 2.5-23.15) times higher odds of experiencing CHE compared to public facilities. Lack of insurance coverage was associated with higher odds of CHE, although not significant. Conclusions: Couples undergoing IVF in public and private hospitals face substantial financial burdens, often resulting in CHE. This justifies the need to improve access to comprehensive infertility services, including IVF, through public health facilities to meet the demand for this emerging health problem.

Suggested Citation

  • Prerana Patil & Akshita Vikani & Deepshikha Sharma & Oshima Sachin & Biju Soman & Bhavani Shankara Bagepally & Renu Tanwar & Vanita Suri & V Radha & M Anitha & P Ramesh & Deepti Shrivastava & Sukhpree, 2026. "Out-of-pocket expenditure experienced by couples seeking In Vitro Fertilization (IVF) services at tertiary care facilities in India," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(7), pages 1-17, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0351080
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0351080
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0351080
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0351080&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0351080?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0351080. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.