Author
Listed:
- Maobao Yang
- Lei Guo
- Gaofei Ren
- Qiuhong Wang
- Yi Liu
Abstract
Reduced audit quality behavior is prevalent in audit practice and poses a serious threat to overall audit quality. With the increasing adoption of digital auditing, auditors’ digital literacy has become essential not only for adapting to the modern audit environment but also for improving audit quality and curbing inappropriate audit practices. This study examines the effect of auditors’ digital literacy on reduced audit quality behavior by introducing digital self-efficacy and task performance as mediating variables and constructing a chain mediation model, while also exploring the moderating role of prosocial behavior. Empirical analysis based on 480 valid questionnaires revealed that digital literacy negatively influences reduced audit quality behavior. Digital self-efficacy and task performance partially mediate this relationship. Additionally, digital self-efficacy positively enhances task performance, resulting in a chain mediating effect. Prosocial behavior moderates these relationships, significantly affecting the mediating roles of digital self-efficacy and task performance. Accordingly, fostering a digitally enabled audit environment that enhances auditors’ analytical efficiency, judgment accuracy, and procedural compliance requires auditors to effectively leverage digital technologies to mitigate audit quality-threatening behavior.
Suggested Citation
Maobao Yang & Lei Guo & Gaofei Ren & Qiuhong Wang & Yi Liu, 2026.
"The effect of auditors’ digital literacy on reduced audit quality behavior: A chain mediation model and the moderating role of prosocial behavior,"
PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(7), pages 1-18, July.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pone00:0350835
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0350835
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0350835. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.