IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0350761.html

Modeling the association between psychological capital and nurses’ job performance: The moderating role of intolerance of uncertainty

Author

Listed:
  • Seyedeh Melika Kharghani Moghadam
  • Ehsan Taheri
  • Ezzat Jafarjalal
  • Hossein Ebrahimi

Abstract

This cross-sectional analytical study aimed to examine the relationship between psychological capital (PsyCap) and nurses’ job performance, as well as the moderating role of intolerance of uncertainty (IU). A total of 212 nurses working in hospitals affiliated with Iran University of Medical Sciences participated. Verbal informed consent was obtained from all participants, as approved by the Ethics Committee of Iran University of Medical Sciences (IR.IUMS.REC.1401.561). Data collection tools included standardized questionnaires on PsyCap, IU, and job performance. Data were analyzed using structural equation modeling (SEM) with SmartPLS software. The measurement model was assessed for reliability and validity, and the structural model was tested for the study hypotheses. The findings indicated that PsyCap was positively and significantly associated with nurses’ job performance (β = 0.38, p

Suggested Citation

  • Seyedeh Melika Kharghani Moghadam & Ehsan Taheri & Ezzat Jafarjalal & Hossein Ebrahimi, 2026. "Modeling the association between psychological capital and nurses’ job performance: The moderating role of intolerance of uncertainty," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(6), pages 1-1, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0350761
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0350761
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0350761
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0350761&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0350761?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0350761. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.