IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0350430.html

Scrolling for science: Assessing the quality and accuracy of Crohn’s disease-related content on Instagram reels

Author

Listed:
  • Sankirth Madabhushi
  • Ami Patel
  • Samantha Tse-Kang
  • Andrew Liu
  • Dhruval Amin
  • Abbas Rupawala

Abstract

Background: There is a concerning trend of misinformation of healthcare related content on social media. Recent studies have examined themes and narratives about Crohn’s disease but have not quantitatively assessed the accuracy and quality of content on Instagram Reels. Our aim was to assess the quality and accuracy of Instagram Reels about Crohn’s disease and examine differences in content by type of creator, from medical professionals to lay individuals. Methods: Seventy-eight top-viewed English-language Instagram Reels tagged with “#crohns” were evaluated. Videos were categorized by creator and content type. Two reviewers evaluated each video for accuracy and quality using an adapted harm/benefit score and the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) benchmark criteria, respectively. Results: Seventeen percent of videos were created by medical professionals and 83% by non-medical users. Educational content was significantly more common among medical professionals than other content creators (62% vs 23%; P = 0.005). No significant correlation was found between engagement metrics and either JAMA or harm/benefit scores. Medical professionals had significantly higher JAMA scores than non-medical users (2.5 vs 2, P

Suggested Citation

  • Sankirth Madabhushi & Ami Patel & Samantha Tse-Kang & Andrew Liu & Dhruval Amin & Abbas Rupawala, 2026. "Scrolling for science: Assessing the quality and accuracy of Crohn’s disease-related content on Instagram reels," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(6), pages 1-12, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0350430
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0350430
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0350430
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0350430&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0350430?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0350430. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.