Author
Listed:
- Rumana Mahtarin
- Kasrina Azad
- Rakib Bin Mahbub Talukder
- Rynak Rahmat
- Suzana Chowdhury Nitu
- Arif Mahmud Howlader
- Mohabbat Hossain
- Mst Sharmin Aktar Mukta
- Mohammad Tanbir Habib
- Abu Bakar Siddik
- Nishat Sultana
- Zannat Kawser
- Umme Kulsum
- Faisal Zainal Abedin
- Nusrat Sultana
- Md Ahashan Habib
- A K M Ekramul Hossain
- Farjana Akther Noor
- Ahmad Zubair Mahdi
- Muhammad Asaduzzaman
- Emran Kabir Chowdhury
- Md Rofiqur Rahman
- Firdausi Qadri
- Mst Noorjahan Begum
- A H M Nurun Nabi
Abstract
Background: β-thalassemia poses a considerable public health burden in Bangladesh, where a high carrier frequency underlies widespread disease risk. It is necessary to distinguish β-thalassemia trait (βTT) and iron deficiency anemia (IDA) to ensure genetic counseling and enable effective prevention strategies. Despite the availability of various discriminant formulas and machine learning algorithms (MLAs), their comparative diagnostic performance within the Bangladeshi population has not been comprehensively investigated. This study aimed to assess different discriminant formulas and ML models as well as to propose novel combinations of formulas for population-specific screening of βTT. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, we compared 47 discriminant formulas and 12 machine learning models to distinguish β-thalassemia trait from iron-deficiency anemia in 467 individuals (143 βTT, 324 anemia) drawn from a 2,514-participant cohort. DF-6 and DF-27 were two new formulas constructed by integrating high-performing formulas. Multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) techniques, TOPSIS (Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution) and SECA (Simultaneous Evaluation of Criteria and Alternatives), provided the final ranking for performance. Cluster analysis was performed to identify groups with similar diagnostic performance. Results: Population-specific optimal cut-off values were determined for the discriminant formulas. The newly proposed formulas, DF-6 and DF-27, ranked among the top ten performers alongside RBC, Janel (11T), Ravanbakhsh-F1, Srivastav, Alparslan, Hisham, Index 26, and Kerman I. DF-6 (AUC: 0.9707) achieved the best overall performance across the diagnostic metrics. DF-6 achieved the best overall performance (AUC: 0.98, 95% CI: 0.97–0.99, p
Suggested Citation
Rumana Mahtarin & Kasrina Azad & Rakib Bin Mahbub Talukder & Rynak Rahmat & Suzana Chowdhury Nitu & Arif Mahmud Howlader & Mohabbat Hossain & Mst Sharmin Aktar Mukta & Mohammad Tanbir Habib & Abu Baka, 2026.
"Diagnostic performance of discriminant formulas and machine learning models for detecting β-thalassemia trait in Bangladesh,"
PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(6), pages 1-28, June.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pone00:0350387
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0350387
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0350387. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.