Author
Listed:
- Wei Yoon Poh
- Amirah Azzeri
- Shamsul Mohd Zain
- Rosmawati Mohamed
- Kim Sui Wan
- Xe Hui Lee
- Maznah Dahlui
- Fatiha Hana Shabaruddin
Abstract
Background and aim: Most international guidelines recommend a two-step approach using the Fibrosis-4 index (FIB-4) and vibration-controlled transient elastography (VCTE) to identify advanced fibrosis, a key predictor of all-cause and liver-related mortality in patients with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD). However, VCTE is not available in most primary care settings in Malaysia, and there is scarce data on the cost-effectiveness of different approaches. This study evaluated the cost-effectiveness of three referral pathways for identifying advanced fibrosis among type 2 diabetes mellitus(T2DM) patients with MASLD. Methods: We developed a decision-analytical model from the healthcare provider’s perspective, using 1,000 simulated patients to compare: (i) Current Practice (direct referral based on elevated alanine transaminase), (ii) Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPG) Pathway using FIB-4 single-cutoff 1.3, and (iii) FIB-4 dual-cutoffs (1.3,3.25) followed by a gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT) test for indeterminate cases (Sequential FIB-4/GGT Pathway). Current practice served as the reference comparator. The primary outcomes were the average cost-effectiveness ratio (ACER) and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). Model parameters were mainly derived from local studies. Direct medical costs were reported in 2024 Malaysian Ringgit (MYR). Results: Sequential FIB-4/GGT pathway had the lowest ACER at MYR930 per advanced fibrosis case identified, compared to MYR1,299 for current practice and MYR1,581 for the CPG pathway. Sequential FIB-4/GGT pathway was potentially more effective and less costly, demonstrating dominance over current practice with a cost savings of MYR2,911/additional advanced fibrosis case identified. CPG pathway was more effective and more costly than current practice, with an ICER of MYR3,785. Conclusions: Sequential FIB-4/GGT pathway was cost-effective for identifying advanced fibrosis in T2DM patients with MASLD. This pragmatic approach could reduce tertiary care referrals, lower healthcare resource use and costs compared to current practice. CPG pathway was more effective than current practice, but incurred higher costs and required increased availability of VCTE within clinical practice.
Suggested Citation
Wei Yoon Poh & Amirah Azzeri & Shamsul Mohd Zain & Rosmawati Mohamed & Kim Sui Wan & Xe Hui Lee & Maznah Dahlui & Fatiha Hana Shabaruddin, 2026.
"Cost-effectiveness of various referral pathways to identify advanced fibrosis among type 2 diabetes mellitus patients with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease in primary care setting in Malaysia,"
PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(5), pages 1-19, May.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pone00:0350263
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0350263
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0350263. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.