IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0350201.html

Incidence and factors associated with reoperation after rotator cuff repair in Korea: A nationwide cohort study

Author

Listed:
  • Yee Ran Lyu
  • Eunkyoung Ahn
  • Doori Kim
  • Changsop Yang
  • Mi Hong Yim

Abstract

Introduction: With the growing interest in rotator cuff repair (RCR), substantial evidence on factors associated with reoperation is crucial for decision-making. This retrospective longitudinal cohort study aimed to investigate the rate of rotator cuff reoperation after repair in Korea and identify factors associated with reoperation while considering the medical services implemented in Korea using the Korean National Health Insurance Database from 2011 to 2021. Methods: Reoperation rates in patients who underwent RCR during a 3.5-year follow-up period were analyzed using Kaplan–Meier analysis. Pre-, intra-, and post-operative factors were analyzed using Cox proportional hazards regression model analyses. Results: This study included 221,361 patients, among whom 15,089 (6.82%) underwent rotator cuff reoperation during the follow-up period, reflecting mid- to long-term reoperation (6 months to 3.5 years after surgery), rather than overall surgical failure. Sex, age, health insurance type, healthcare institution type, comorbidities, primary RCR type, arthroscopy use, primary diagnosis of primary RCR, and time to the first outpatient visit for Korean medicine healthcare or conventional medical healthcare were associated with rotator cuff reoperation. Conclusion: Our results may help perioperative decision-making and postoperative management strategies related to reoperation risk, while considering patient characteristics, and may support counselling regarding the timing of postoperative care.

Suggested Citation

  • Yee Ran Lyu & Eunkyoung Ahn & Doori Kim & Changsop Yang & Mi Hong Yim, 2026. "Incidence and factors associated with reoperation after rotator cuff repair in Korea: A nationwide cohort study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(5), pages 1-20, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0350201
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0350201
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0350201
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0350201&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0350201?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0350201. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.