IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0350113.html

Identification and prediction of patients eligible for augmented rehabilitation in emergency gastrointestinal surgery (RAUCisable): A protocol for a single-centre, retrospective, observational study

Author

Listed:
  • Émilien Arnaud
  • Gilles Dequen
  • Émilie Chivé
  • Delphine Lignier
  • William Gacquer
  • Momar Diouf
  • Thibaut Balcaen
  • Daniel Aiham Ghazali
  • Jean-Marc Regimbeau

Abstract

Introduction: Conditions requiring emergency gastrointestinal surgery pose substantial challenges to healthcare systems and patient outcomes. For emergency gastrointestinal surgery, the mortality rate is higher than after other types of surgery, and 30-day readmission rates can exceed 30%. Unlike elective surgery (for which the application of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) procedures has led to demonstrably better recovery), emergency surgery patients are still managed in an ad hoc manner. The Réhabilitation Augmentée pour les Urgences Chirurgicales (RAUC) multi-faceted research program has been designed to transform the care of patients undergoing emergency gastrointestinal surgery [7]. The ancillary RAUCisable study will develop a classification model that can automatically flag up RAUC-eligible patients early in their visit to the emergency department (ED). The study’s secondary objectives include the identification of key features and the prediction of time to surgery. Method: RAUCisable is single-centre, retrospective, observational cohort study of electronic health records in the ED and digestive surgery department at Amiens-Picardie University Hospital (Amiens, France). All adult patients having attended the ED between January 1st, 2021, and December 31st, 2024, will be considered for inclusion. The primary classification outcome is eligibility for the RAUC pathway. Expected results: We expect to identify ~2,400 RAUC-eligible patients from among ~250,000–300,000 ED visits over a 4-year period. These patients are likely to be significantly older than non-surgical ED patients (e.g., more over-65s), with a higher proportion of acute abdominal conditions (e.g., ~ 24% with appendicitis, ~ 13% with bowel obstruction, ~ 10% with peritonitis, etc.), and greater disease acuity on triage. Discussion: The RAUCisable study’s findings will directly guide a concomitant, prospective, controlled study (RAUC-AMIENS) of the augmented recovery pathway, including ERAS elements and remote monitoring. Conclusion: The RAUCisable study is a pivotal step toward digitally enhanced emergency surgical care. By learning from past data, we are seeking to improve the future management of emergency surgery patients through timely identification and targeted care pathways. This protocol article details our methodological approach for ensuring rigor and reproducibility. Trial registration: NCT07037719

Suggested Citation

  • Émilien Arnaud & Gilles Dequen & Émilie Chivé & Delphine Lignier & William Gacquer & Momar Diouf & Thibaut Balcaen & Daniel Aiham Ghazali & Jean-Marc Regimbeau, 2026. "Identification and prediction of patients eligible for augmented rehabilitation in emergency gastrointestinal surgery (RAUCisable): A protocol for a single-centre, retrospective, observational study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(6), pages 1-18, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0350113
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0350113
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0350113
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0350113&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0350113?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0350113. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.