Author
Listed:
- Zhiyuan Gao
- Jiaolei Zhang
- Lei Cao
Abstract
Steel plates and bolted connections have become common construction details in prefabricated structural systems. However, prefabricated frame structures with steel plate hoop–bolted connections exhibit connection gaps, interface slip, and discontinuous force-transfer paths, making them prone to hysteretic degradation and cumulative damage under seismic loading. Conventional seismic fragility assessments typically rely on the maximum inter-story drift ratio, which focuses only on deformation demand and fails to capture key deterioration mechanisms such as low-cycle damage accumulation, stiffness degradation, and reduced energy dissipation capacity. Consequently, the seismic performance of prefabricated structures may be inadequately represented. To address this limitation, this study adopts a two-parameter damage model as the engineering demand parameter for incremental dynamic analysis (IDA) and fragility assessment, and compares it with the traditional drift-based index. An energy-dissipation-based story damage weighting method is further introduced to better characterize damage distribution and performance degradation along the structural height. Finite element models of prefabricated columns and beam–column joints with steel plate hoop–bolted connections were developed in SAP2000 using multilinear plastic link elements and validated against quasi-static test results. A comparative fragility analysis was then performed for six-story full prefabricated and cast-in-place frame structures. The results show that the inter-story drift ratio underestimates structural capacity in the elastic stage but overestimates collapse resistance compared with the two-parameter damage model.
Suggested Citation
Zhiyuan Gao & Jiaolei Zhang & Lei Cao, 2026.
"Seismic fragility analysis of fully prefabricated frame structures with steel plate hoop bolt connections based on various engineering demand parameters,"
PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(5), pages 1-25, May.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pone00:0350096
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0350096
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0350096. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.