IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0350005.html

Mortality salience effects and status consumption–A reasoned action approach

Author

Listed:
  • Jolien Arendsen
  • Guido M van Koningsbruggen
  • Marieke L Fransen

Abstract

Prior research suggests that mortality salience (MS) can promote status consumption, yet it remains unclear how these effects are formed. To address this gap, we applied the Reasoned Action Approach, which provides a systematic framework to examine how MS may influence intentions to engage in status consumption. Study 1, a belief elicitation study, identified the set of salient beliefs related to status consumption. Study 2 revealed that MS influenced two out of 29 beliefs underlying status consumption identified in Study 1. Additionally, experiential attitude was a weaker predictor of the intention to engage in status consumption after MS. However, no effects of MS were observed on the intention to purchase status products or its determinants. Taken together, these findings suggest that, although MS may influence some underlying beliefs about status consumption, these changes are too weak to translate into meaningful differences in consumers’ behavioral intentions. By using the Reasoned Action Approach, the present research advances our understanding of how MS may or may not influence consumer intentions. It also suggests that MS’s influence on status consumption may be more limited than previously assumed.

Suggested Citation

  • Jolien Arendsen & Guido M van Koningsbruggen & Marieke L Fransen, 2026. "Mortality salience effects and status consumption–A reasoned action approach," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(5), pages 1-18, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0350005
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0350005
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0350005
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0350005&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0350005?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0350005. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.