IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0349936.html

Older age and sex differences in the proportion of vital signs flagged as abnormal

Author

Listed:
  • Jean-Philippe Emond
  • Vincent Weng-Jy Cheung
  • Ariel Mundo Ortiz
  • Robert Goulden
  • Sahar Saeed
  • Philippe Desmarais
  • Michaël Chassé
  • Christina Wolfson
  • Quoc Dinh Nguyen

Abstract

Background: The variability of vital signs thresholds has not been well described in relation to older age and sex assigned at birth. Significant variations may influence clinical interpretation of vital signs, most notably the thresholds at which investigations or treatments are initiated. Our objective was to compare, in stable health status, the percentage of abnormal values (flagging percentage) of standard vital signs thresholds of adults aged 45 years and older and to determine centile-based thresholds by age and sex. Methods: A retrospective observational study was conducted using data from the Centre for the Integration and Analysis of Medical Data (CITADEL) at the Centre hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal (CHUM), a tertiary care hospital. All inpatients and outpatients, from January 2012 to December 2021, were included. For individuals with multiple visits, a single hospitalization or a single outpatient visit was selected at random for inclusion. To reflect a stable health status, the last vital signs recorded before hospital discharge were selected and in-hospital deaths were excluded. Flagging percentages were identified using a quantile-based approach. Age and sex specific centile-based thresholds were determined by identifying values at the 2.5th and 97.5th centiles. Flagging percentages and centile values for systolic and diastolic blood pressure, heart rate, and temperature were analyzed by age group (45–54, 55–64, 65–74, 75–84, and 85 + years) and sex. Results: The sample comprised 123,420 individuals, including 90,813 inpatients. Flagging percentages for the standard threshold of upper systolic blood pressure (140 mmHg) ranged from 13.3 (12.7–13.9) % (45-54y assigned female at birth (AFAB)) to 39.8 (38.6–41.0) % (85y+ AFAB). Flagging percentages for standard thresholds ranged between 0.1 (0.1–0.2) to 1.2 (1.0–1.4) % for upper temperature (37.8°C), lower temperature (35.0°C), and lower systolic blood pressure (90 mmHg). Across subgroups, the 97.5th centile-based adapted thresholds varied between 158 (156−159) – 178 (177−180) mmHg for upper systolic blood pressure and between 37.2 (37.1–37.2) – 37.3 (37.3–37.3) °C for upper temperature. Conclusions: Important differences in vital signs flagging percentages may affect their comparability by vital sign, age, and sex. Standard thresholds may need to be reassessed using clinical outcomes to factor age and sex differences.

Suggested Citation

  • Jean-Philippe Emond & Vincent Weng-Jy Cheung & Ariel Mundo Ortiz & Robert Goulden & Sahar Saeed & Philippe Desmarais & Michaël Chassé & Christina Wolfson & Quoc Dinh Nguyen, 2026. "Older age and sex differences in the proportion of vital signs flagged as abnormal," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(5), pages 1-16, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0349936
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0349936
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0349936
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0349936&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0349936?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0349936. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.